Description: Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens war, die Kenntnisse über die Einflussfaktoren einer gelingenden Risikokommunikation im Bereich wissenschaftlicher Unsicherheiten zu vertiefen und Strategien zur laiengerechten Risikokommunikation für die Bereiche der nieder- und hochfrequenten elektromagnetischen Felder (EMF) zu erarbeiten. Adressaten der Kommunikation sind die allgemeine Bevölkerung, Multiplikatoren und Stakeholder. Dabei war die zentrale Frage, wie der wissenschaftliche Kenntnisstand einschließlich der verbleibenden Unsicherheiten kommuniziert werden kann, ohne die Besorgnis zu vergrößern oder einen Vertrauensverlust in die Wissenschaft bzw. den Absender der Information hervorzurufen.
Types:
SupportProgram
Origins:
/Bund/UBA/UFORDAT
Tags:
Elektromagnetisches Feld
?
Textilchemikalien
?
Datierung
?
Interview
?
Stellungnahme
?
Wirkung
?
Risikokommunikation
?
Ackerfläche
?
Bewertung
?
Informationsvermittlung
?
Interessenvertreter
?
Kommunikation
?
Öffentlichkeitsinformation
?
Wirkung
?
Forschungsprojekt
?
Bevölkerung
?
Forschung
?
Risiko
?
Verkehr
?
Gebiet
?
Strategische Aspekte
?
Staatsbürger
?
Bemessung
?
Buchhaltung
?
ERGEBNIS
?
INFORMATIONSVERARBEITUNG
?
PFAD
?
PROJEKT
?
SCHUTZ
?
Theorie
?
VERFUEGBAR
?
WISSENSCHAFTLICH
?
Region:
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Bounding boxes:
6.76339° .. 6.76339° x 51.21895° .. 51.21895°
License: cc-by-nc-nd/4.0
Language: Deutsch
Organisations
Time ranges:
2008-10-14 - 2010-01-31
Alternatives
-
Language: Englisch/English
Title: Easily understood communication of scientific uncertainties in the field of EMF
Description: The aim of the research project 'Laymen adequate communication of scientific uncertainties in thefield of EMF (3608S03016)' was, to improve the knowledge about the influencing factors for a successfulrisk communication in the field of scientific uncertainties and to develop strategies for a laymen adequate riskcommunication in the range of low- and high frequency electromagnetic fields. To date little is known aboutthe effects of communicating uncertainties concerning the risk assessment of electromagnetic fields; in addition,the available evidence is contradictory. The majority of experts interviewed are in favour of reportinguncertainties. They assume that it strengthens the sender's credibility and the confidence in his statement. Butexperts' practical knowledge and the results of evidence-based research on risk communication are inconsistent.The experimental results indicate that information and communication about uncertainties depend on thetype of uncertainty discussed. The effects differ depending on whether the existence of a risk, its size or therisk protection is concerned. The inconsistent results of the interviews and the experimental research can beintegrated by the means of Petty's and Cacioppo's Elaboration Likelihood theory (1986). Citizens that are motivatedand possess knowledge in the matter of risks can be reached via the central path but poorly motivatedcitizens and those without previous knowledge can only be reached via the peripheral path of information processing.Therefore communication about uncertainties has to account for both paths of information processing- the central and the peripheral.
https://ufordat.uba.de/UFORDAT/pages/PublicRedirect.aspx?TYP=PR&DSNR=1022083
Status
Quality score
- Overall: 0.45
-
Findability: 0.46
- Title: 0.00
- Description: 0.07
- Identifier: false
- Keywords: 0.69
- Spatial: RegionIdentified (1.00)
- Temporal: true
-
Accessibility: 0.67
- Landing page: Specific (1.00)
- Direct access: false
- Publicly accessible: true
-
Interoperability: 0.00
- Open file format: false
- Media type: false
- Machine-readable metadata: false
- Machine-readable data: false
-
Reusability: 0.67
- License: ClearlySpecifiedAndFree (1.00)
- Contact info: false
- Publisher info: true
Accessed 1 times.