<p>The database of the PONDSCAPE project (Towards a sustainable management of pond diversity at the landscape level) comprises taxon occurrence data of eight different organism groups (bacteria, phytoplankton, diatoms, cladoceran, macro-invertebrates (mollusks, heteropterans and coleopterans), macrophytes, amphibians and fish) and data on physical, chemical and morphometric variables of 125 farmland ponds covering five biogeographic regions in Belgium/Luxembourg</p>
The Floods Directive (FD), implemented in November 2007 addresses the rising threat of catastrophic and frequent floods in Europe due to socioeconomic development and climate change. Its purpose is to establish a framework for assessing and managing flood risks within the European Union, with the goal of reducing adverse impacts on human health, the environment, cultural heritage, and economic activity.
This database contains policies and measures (PaMs) reported by EU Member States following European Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1522 of 11 October 2018 laying down a common format for national air pollution control programmes under Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants. This database will be updated on a quarterly basis. It is important to note that the database only contains latest data that has been reported by Member States using the PAM-tool: https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/. The completeness and accuracy of the data depends on the quality of reporting by each country. Release years: 2019 v1: Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Portugal,Slovenia, Spain, Sweden 2020 v1: Czechia, Hungary, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovakia 2021 v1: Greece, Ireland 2022 v1: Lithuania 2023 v1: Estonia, Romania, France, Ireland, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Poland 2024 v1: Austria, Spain, Sweden 2024 v2: Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, Slovenia 2024 v3: Austria, Cyrus, Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, Slovenia, Sweden 2025 v1: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Sweden
This metadata refers to the whole content of GISCO reference database, which contains both public datasets (also available for the general public through http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata) and datasets to be used only internally by the EEA (typically, but not only, GISCO datasets at 1:100k).
The Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action ((EU) 2018/1999) requires Member States to report national projections of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Every two years, each EU Member State shall report GHG projections in a ‘with existing measures’ scenario for the years 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and 2050 by gas (or group of gases) and by sector. National projections shall take into consideration any policies and measures adopted at Union level. The reported data are quality checked by the EEA and its European Topic Centre for Climate Change Mitigation and Energy (ETC/CME).
Additional reporting in the area of renewable energy is a dataset under the National Energy and Climate Progress Reports (NECPRs), which is reported every second year (starting in 2023) by EU Member States. The dataset provides information regarding Member States functioning system for guarantees of origin (GO), renewable energy surplus/deficits, biomass use and impacts, and renewable energy usage in buildings. The EEA collects and quality checks this data. The dataset links to data from Eurostat. This reporting obligation comes from the Governance Regulation 2018/1999, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2299 (Annex XVI).
The over all objective of PO3PLAR is to complement the Level II ozone injury assessment program of the ICP-Forests WG on Ambient Air Quality with a well known and already investigated ozone sensitive bio-indicator species such a Populus spp. A successful establishment of the indicated bio-indicator on the Light Exposed Sampling Sites (LESS; see Manual for Assessment of Ozone Injury) will allow us to collect additional data on plant responses to ambient ozone concentrations on the very same species and variety across Europe. Excluding the disturbing factor of differing species composition of forest ecosystems and differing species specific responses to ozone (under the given microclimatic conditions) a harmonized bio-indicator network may allow us to gain additional valuable information to be implemented in regional as well as European efforts on ozone risk assessment. The 2007 season will serve as a test phase providing the participating countries to gain experience with the optimal planting procedure (soil, water availability, growth rate, etc.) hopefully leading to first successful phenological and physiological measurements and observations throughout the 2007 season. Currently the following 12 countries are participating in the PO3PLAR bio-indicator survey: Spain, Italy, France, Lithuania, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Belgium, USA and Switzerland whereas Switzerland is serving as the coordinator and data manager. From an organizational point of view, this project is not an official part of the ozone injury assessment program of the ICP-Forests WG on Ambient Air Quality. However, if successful we may be able to attract more interest in the respective community and hopefully generate some funding in the near future.
The present dataset from Germany is encompassed in the European Biodiversa BioRodDis project (Managing BIOdiversity in forests and urban green spaces: Dilution and amplification effects on RODent microbiomes and rodent-borne DISeases. Project coordinator: Nathalie Charbonnel, Senior researcher (DR2, INRAE), nathalie.charbonnel@inrae.fr - https://www6.inrae.fr/biodiversa-bioroddis). The project comes with the purpose to explore on a large scale the relationship between biodiversity of rodents, rodent-borne diseases dynamics and differences over time in a changing climate and it includes data of small terrestrial mammals from temperate forests and urban parks from the following countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland and Poland. The present dataset includes records of small mammals (Rodentia) occurrences trapped in urbanised and forested areas in northeast Germany in the district of Potsdam (Brandenburg). Samplings and data collection took place throughout three years and during a total of four seasons: winter 2020, spring 2021, autumn 2021 and spring 2022. The number of sampling sites varied between 2 and 4 per seasons, with two main sites (Germany EastA and Germany EastB) being permanent in each sampling season. These variations are mainly due to the impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic regulations (2020, 2021) on the organisation and the execution of fieldwork and to the exclusion subsequently of forested sites with very low density of animals (≤10 individuals: Germany EastC, Germany EastB). The two main sampling sites represent different levels of anthropisation. The site Germany EastA is around the Botanical Garden belonging to the University of Potsdam with a mixture of sealed and wooded areas and a constant human presence while the site Germany EastB is a forested sub-urbanised area outside of the city composed by mixed coniferous forests, meadows, crossed by a main road and with occasional human presence (hunters, foresters). All animals were live captured (as in Schirmer et al., 2019) using a combination of Ugglan and Longworth traps for a total of 100-150 traps, depending on site and year. Traps were placed in 4 to 6 lines with 25m distance, and each line was composed by a total of 25 traps placed with 10m distance from each other. Fieldwork actions generally started with 1-4 days of pre-baiting followed by 1-10 days of trapping, according to efficiency of trapping and subprojects included. The sites Germany EastC and Germany EastD were excluded from the last two seasons because of very low trapping success during the previous seasons. All the traps were controlled daily during early morning hours and were activated again in the evening, with animals spending not more than eight hours in the trap. Baiting mixture consisted of oat flakes and apples and all traps were equipped with insulating material, like hay or wood wool. Taxonomical identification was determined in the field at species level according to morphology and previously recorded species occurrences in the sampling area (Dolch, 1995). Molecular identification of Apodemus flavicollis and Microtus individuals that were subsequently dissected was performed by the CBGP (France) using CO1 sequencing for Microtus species following Pagès et al., 2010, and DNA fingerprinting (AP-PCR) for Apodemus species (Bugarski-Stanojević et al., 2013). Dissections and body measurements were performed following the protocols described in Herbreteau et al., 2011. At the end of all seasons, a total of 620 occurrences of rodents was recorded, belonging to two main families (Muridae, Cricetidae) and four different species (Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus agrarius, Myodes glareolus and Microtus arvalis). Additionally, for a subset of individuals (n=264), body measurements like weight, body length, head width, tail length and hind foot length as well as sexual maturity data were recorded. Animals were captured in accordance with the applicable international and institutional guidelines for the use of animals in research. The trapping and collection of rodents was performed under the permission of “Landesamt für Arbeitsschutz, Verbraucherschutz und Gesundheit Brandenburg (LAVG)“ (no. 2347-A-16-1-2020 for procedure, LUGV_RW7-4744/41+5#243052/2015 and N1 0424 for trapping) and “Landesamt für Umwelt Brandenburg (LfU)” (no. LFU-N1-4744/97+17#194297/2020, for sites and species exemptions). This project was funded through the 2018-2019 BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivERsA3 ERA-Net COFUND programme, and coordinated by the German Science Foundation DFG (Germany). Citations: 1) Bugarski-Stanojević, V., Blagojević, J., Adnađević, T., Jovanović, V., & Vujošević, M. (2013). Identification of the sibling species Apodemus sylvaticus and Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Muridae)—Comparison of molecular methods. Zoologischer Anzeiger - A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 252(4), 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2012.11.004 2) Dolch, D. (1995). Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Brandenburg. 97. 3) Herbreteau, V., Jittapalapong, S., Rerkamnuaychoke, W., Chaval, Y., Cosson, J.-F., & Morand, S. (2011). Protocols for field and laboratory rodent studies. 56. 4) Pagès, M., Chaval, Y., Herbreteau, V., Waengsothorn, S., Cosson, J.-F., Hugot, J.-P., Morand, S., & Michaux, J. (2010). Revisiting the taxonomy of the Rattini tribe: A phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-184 5) Schirmer, A., Herde, A., Eccard, J. A., & Dammhahn, M. (2019). Individuals in space: Personality-dependent space use, movement and microhabitat use facilitate individual spatial niche specialization. Oecologia, 189(3), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04365-5
| Origin | Count |
|---|---|
| Bund | 456 |
| Europa | 265 |
| Global | 1 |
| Land | 100 |
| Wissenschaft | 61 |
| Zivilgesellschaft | 13 |
| Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Daten und Messstellen | 28 |
| Ereignis | 16 |
| Förderprogramm | 235 |
| Taxon | 18 |
| Text | 179 |
| Umweltprüfung | 3 |
| unbekannt | 386 |
| License | Count |
|---|---|
| geschlossen | 202 |
| offen | 398 |
| unbekannt | 262 |
| Language | Count |
|---|---|
| Deutsch | 429 |
| Englisch | 483 |
| Resource type | Count |
|---|---|
| Archiv | 55 |
| Bild | 6 |
| Datei | 104 |
| Dokument | 196 |
| Keine | 343 |
| Multimedia | 1 |
| Unbekannt | 16 |
| Webdienst | 74 |
| Webseite | 353 |
| Topic | Count |
|---|---|
| Boden | 470 |
| Lebewesen und Lebensräume | 492 |
| Luft | 342 |
| Mensch und Umwelt | 850 |
| Wasser | 513 |
| Weitere | 862 |