API src

Found 13 results.

Buildings data from Remote Rapid Visual survey (RRVS) for exposure modelling in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

The dataset contains a set of structural and non-structural attributes collected using the GFZ RRVS methodology in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, within the framework of the projects EMCA (Earthquake Model Central Asia), funded by GEM, and "Assessing Seismic Risk in the Kyrgyz Republic", funded by the World Bank. The survey has been carried out between 2012 and 2016 using a Remote Rapid Visual Screening system developed by GFZ and employing omnidirectional images and footprints from OpenStreetMap. The attributes are encoded according to the GEM taxonomy v2.0 (see https://taxonomy.openquake.org). The following attributes are defined (not all are observable in the RRVS survey): code description lon longitude in fraction of degrees lat latitude in fraction of degrees object_id unique id of the building surveyed MAT_TYPE Material Type MAT_TECH Material Technology MAT_PROP Material Property LLRS Type of Lateral Load-Resisting System LLRS_DUCT System Ductility HEIGHT Height YR_BUILT Date of Construction or Retrofit OCCUPY Building Occupancy Class - General OCCUPY_DT Building Occupancy Class - Detail POSITION Building Position within a Block PLAN_SHAPE Shape of the Building Plan STR_IRREG Regular or Irregular STR_IRREG_DT Plan Irregularity or Vertical Irregularity STR_IRREG_TYPE Type of Irregularity NONSTRCEXW Exterior walls ROOF_SHAPE Roof Shape ROOFCOVMAT Roof Covering ROOFSYSMAT Roof System Material ROOFSYSTYP Roof System Type ROOF_CONN Roof Connections FLOOR_MAT Floor Material FLOOR_TYPE Floor System Type FLOOR_CONN Floor Connections. For each building an EMCA vulnerability class has been assigned following the fuzzy scoring methodology described in Pittore et al., 2018. The related class definition schema (as a .json document) is included in the data package.

EMCA Seismic exposure model for the Kyrgyz Republic

Multi-resolution exposure model for seismic risk assessment in the Kyrgyz Republic. The model has been developed according to the methodology outlined in Pittore, Haas and Silva (2019) "Multi-resolution Probabilistic Modelling of Residential Exposure and Vulnerability for Seismic Risk Applications", Earthquake Spectra. The model is aggregated over a Central Voronoidal Tessellation (CVT) composed of 1'175 geo-cells covering the territory of the Kyrgyz Republic. The model integrates around 6'000 building observations (see related dataset Pittore et al. 2019). The following specific modelling parameters have been employed: Two exposure models are provided, with prior strength pw 10 and 100. Both models have epsilon=0.001 (see publication indicated in the metadata for details on the modelling process). For each geo-cell the model includes the expected number of buildings , total occupancy and replacement cost for each of the 15 building types defined in the EMCA taxonomy (see Pittore et al, 2019b), plus the buildings that are belonging to other, non specified typologies (described by building type OTH). Each geo-cell also includes the area of the geo-cell itself in squared km. The data package contains three components: 1) exposure models in .csv 2) exposure models in .xml - the file is encoded in NRML 0.5 format and is compatible with the GEM openquake processing engine 3) shapefile of the tessellation that aggregates the exposure model. The field "cell_id" is the linkage with the exposure models

EMCA Seismic exposure model for Turkmenistan

Multi-resolution exposure model for seismic risk assessment in Turkmenistan. The model has been developed according to the methodology outlined in Pittore, Haas and Silva (2019) "Multi-resolution Probabilistic Modelling of Residential Exposure and Vulnerability for Seismic Risk Applications", Earthquake Spectra. The model is aggregated over a Central Voronoidal Tessellation (CVT) composed of geo-cells covering the territory of Turkmenistan (provided as a separate file). The model prior is based on user-elicited knowledge. The following specific modelling parameters have been employed: Two exposure models are provided, with prior strength pw 10 and 100. Both models have epsilon=0.001 (see publication indicated in the metadata for details on the modelling process) For each geo-cell the model includes the expected number of buildings , total occupancy and replacement cost for each of the 15 building types defined in the EMCA taxonomy (see Pittore et al, 2019b), plus the buildings that are belonging to other, non specified typologies (described by building type OTH). Each geo-cell also includes the area of the geo-cell itself in squared km. The data package contains three components: 1) exposure models in .csv 2) exposure models in .xml - the file is encoded in NRML 0.5 format and is compatible with the GEM openquake processing engine 3) shapefile of the tessellation that aggregates the exposure model. The field "cell_id" is the linkage with the exposure models

EMCA Seismic exposure model for Kazakhstan

Multi-resolution exposure model for seismic risk assessment in Kazakhstan. The model has been developed according to the methodology outlined in Pittore, Haas and Silva (2019) "Multi-resolution Probabilistic Modelling of Residential Exposure and Vulnerability for Seismic Risk Applications", Earthquake Spectra. The model is aggregated over a Central Voronoidal Tessellation (CVT) composed of geo-cells covering the territory of Kazakhstan (provided as a separate file). The model prior is based on user-elicited knowledge. The following specific modelling parameters have been employed: Two exposure models are provided, with prior strength pw 10 and 100. Both models have epsilon=0.001 (see publication indicated in the metadata for details on the modelling process). For each geo-cell the model includes the expected number of buildings , total occupancy and replacement cost for each of the 15 building types defined in the EMCA taxonomy (see Pittore et al, 2019b), plus the buildings that are belonging to other, non specified typologies (described by building type OTH). Each geo-cell also includes the area of the geo-cell itself in squared km. The data package contains three components: 1) exposure models in .csv 2) exposure models in .xml - the file is encoded in NRML 0.5 format and is compatible with the GEM openquake processing engine 3) shapefile of the tessellation that aggregates the exposure model. The field "cell_id" is the linkage with the exposure models

EMCA Seismic exposure model for Tajikistan

Multi-resolution exposure model for seismic risk assessment in Tajikistan. The model has been developed according to the methodology outlined in Pittore, Haas and Silva (2020) "Multi-resolution Probabilistic Modelling of Residential Exposure and Vulnerability for Seismic Risk Applications", Earthquake Spectra (submitted). The model is aggregated over a Central Voronoidal Tessellation (CVT) composed of geo-cells covering the territory of Tajikistan (provided as a separate file). The model integrates around 1'000 building observations (see related dataset Pittore et al. 2019a). The following specific modelling parameters have been employed: Prior strength=10, 100 Epsilon=0.001 For each geo-cell the model includes the expected number of buildings , total occupancy and replacement cost for each of the 15 building types defined in the EMCA taxonomy (see Pittore et al, 2019b), plus the buildings that are belonging to other, non specified typologies (described by building type OTH). Each geo-cell also includes the area of the geo-cell itself in squared km. The data package contains three components: 1) exposure models in .csv 2) exposure models in .xml - the file is encoded in NRML 0.5 format and is compatible with the GEM openquake processing engine 3) shapefile of the tessellation that aggregates the exposure model. The field "cell_id" is the linkage with the exposure models

Hydrometeorological data from ROMPS network in Central Asia

The Regional Research Network „Water in Central Asia“ (CAWa) funded by the German Federal Foreign Office consists of 19 remotely operated multi-parameter stations (ROMPS) in Central Asia. These stations were installed by the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) in Potsdam, Germany in close cooperation with the Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, the national hydrometeorological services in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, the Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, and the Kabul Polytechnic University, Afghanistan. The primary objective of these stations is to support the establishment of a reliable data basis of meteorological and hydrological data especially in remote areas with extreme climate conditions in Central Asia for applications in climate and water monitoring. Up to now, ten years of data are provided for an area of scarce station distribution and with limited open access data which can be used for a wide range of scientific or engineering applications. This dataset provides different types of raw hydrometeorological data such as air temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, wind speed and direction, precipitation, solar radiation, soil moisture and soil temperature as well as snow parameters and river discharge information for selected sites. The data has not undergone any quality control mechanism and should, therefore, be seen as raw data. A visual inspection of the data set has been made and some errors and quality degradation are listed in Zech et al. (2020) but does not claim to be complete. A quality control is strongly recommended by the authors before using the data. Each station data has its own storage directory at the data dissemination server named with the abbreviation (4-letter code) of the station. The data is sampled with a 5-minute interval and stored in hourly files separated by the type of data. These files are then archived as monthly files named with the station abbreviation, type of data, year and month. After one year, these monthly files are further archived to a yearly file. A detailed description for the stations is provided by the Station Exposure Descriptions. Further information about the dataset can be found in Zech et al. (2020). All data is compiled as ASCII data in two different formats which are explained in the documents GITW-SSP-FMT-GFZ-003.pdf (for the stations ALAI, ALA6, and SARY) and CAWA-SSP-FMT-GFZ-006.pdf (for all other stations). Monthly, the data will be dynamically extended as long as data can be acquired from the stations. Additionally, the near real-time data can be displayed and downloaded without any registration from the Sensor Data Storage System (SDSS) hosted at the Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

Multi-temporal landslide inventory for a study area in Southern Kyrgyzstan derived from RapidEye satellite time series data (2009 – 2013)

Multi-temporal landslide inventories are important information for the understanding of landslide dynamics and related predisposing and triggering factors, and thus a crucial prerequisite for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment. Despite the great importance of these inventories, they do not exist for many landslide prone regions in the world. In this context, the recently evolving global-scale availability of high temporal and spatial resolution optical satellite imagery (RapidEye, Sentinel-2A/B, planet) has opened up new opportunities for the creation of these multi-temporal inventories.Taking up on these at the time still to be evolving opportunities, a semi-automated spatiotemporal landslide mapper was developed at the Remote Sensing Section of the GFZ Potsdam being capable of deriving post-failure landslide objects (polygons) from optical satellite time series data (Behling et al., 2014). The developed algorithm was applied to a 7500 km² study area using RapidEye time series data which were acquired in the frame of the RESA project (Project ID 424) for the time period between 2009 and 2013. A multi-temporal landslide inventory from 1986 to 2013 derived from multi-sensor optical satellite time series data is available as separate publications (Behling et al., 2016; Behling and Roessner, 2020).The resulting multi-temporal landslide inventory being subject of this data publication is supplementary to the article of Behling et al. (2014), which describes the developed spatiotemporal landslide mapper in detail. This landslide mapper detects landslide objects by analyzing temporal NDVI-based vegetation cover changes and relief-oriented parameters in a rule-based approach combining pixel- and object-based analysis. Typical landslide-related vegetation changes comprise abrupt disturbances of the vegetation cover in the result of the actual failure as well as post-failure revegetation which usually happens at a slower pace compared to vegetation growth in the surrounding undisturbed areas, since the displaced landslide masses are susceptible to subsequent erosion and reactivation processes. The resulting landslide-specific temporal surface cover dynamics in form of temporal trajectories is used as input information to detect freshly occurred landslides and to separate them from other temporal variations in the surrounding vegetation cover (e.g., seasonal vegetation changes or changes due to agricultural activities) and from permanently non-vegetated areas (e.g., urban non-vegetated areas, water bodies, rock outcrops). For a detailed description of the methodology of the spatiotemporal landslide mapper, please see Behling et al. (2014).The data are provided in vector format (polygons) in form of a standard shapefile contained in the zip-file Behling_et-al_2014_landslide_inventory_SouthernKyrgyzstan_2009_2013.zip and are described in more detail in the data description file.

Multi-temporal landslide inventory for a study area in Southern Kyrgyzstan derived from multi-sensor optical satellite time series data (1986 – 2013)

Multi-temporal landslide inventories are important information for the understanding of landslide dynamics and related predisposing and triggering factors, and thus a crucial prerequisite for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment. Despite the great importance of these inventories, they do not exist for many landslide prone regions in the world. In this context, the recently evolving global-scale availability of high temporal and spatial resolution optical satellite imagery (RapidEye, Sentinel-2A/B, planet) has opened up new opportunities for the creation of these multi-temporal inventories.To derive such multi-temporal landslide inventories, a semi-automated spatiotemporal landslide mapper was developed at the Remote Sensing Section of the GFZ Potsdam being capable of deriving post-failure landslide objects (polygons) from multi-sensor optical satellite time series data (Behling et al., 2016). The developed approach represents an extension of the original methodology (Behling et al., 2014, Behling and Roessner, 2020) and facilitates the integration of optical time series data acquired by different satellite systems. The goal of combining satellite data originating from variable sensor systems has been the establishment of longest possible time series for retrospective systematic assessment of multi-temporal landslide activity at highest possible temporal and spatial resolution. We applied the developed approach to a 2500 km² study area in Southern Kyrgyzstan using an optical satellite database acquired by the Landsat TM/ETM+, SPOT 1/5, IRS1-C LISSIII, ASTER, and RapidEye sensor systems covering a time period between 1986 and 2013. A multi-temporal landslide inventory from 2009-2013 derived from RapidEye satellite time series data is available as separate publications (Behling et al., 2014; Behling and Roessner, 2020).The resulting systematic multi-temporal landslide inventory being subject of this data publication is supplementary to the article of Behling et al. (2016), which describes the extended spatiotemporal landslide mapper in detail. This multi-sensor approach prioritizes most suitable images within the available multi-sensor satellite time series using parameters, such as spatial resolution, cloud coverage, similarity of sensor characteristics and seasonality related to vegetation characteristics with the goal of establishing a robust back-bone time series for initial detection of possible landslide objects. In a second step, this initial analysis gets more refined in order to achieve the best possible approximation of the date of landslide occurrence. For a more detailed description of the methodology of the extended spatiotemporal landslide mapper, please see Behling et al. (2016).In general, this landslide mapper detects landslide objects by analyzing temporal NDVI-based vegetation cover changes and relief-oriented parameters in a rule-based approach combining pixel- and object-based analysis. Typical landslide-related vegetation changes comprise abrupt disturbances of vegetation cover in the result of the actual failure as well as post-failure revegetation which usually happens at a slower pace compared to vegetation growth in the surrounding undisturbed areas, since the displaced landslide masses are susceptible to subsequent erosion and reactivation processes. The resulting landslide-specific temporal surface cover dynamics in form of temporal trajectories is used as input information to identify freshly occurred landslides and to separate them from other temporal variations in the surrounding vegetation cover (e.g., seasonal vegetation changes or changes due to agricultural activities) and from permanently non-vegetated areas (e.g., urban non-vegetated areas, water bodies, rock outcrops).The data are provided in vector format (polygons) in form of a standard shapefile contained in the zip-file 2020-002_Behling_et-al_2016_landslide_inventory_SouthernKyrgyzstan_1986_2013.zip and are described in more detail in the associated data description.

EMCA Seismic exposure model for Uzbekistan

Multi-resolution exposure model for seismic risk assessment in Uzbekistan. The model has been developed according to the methodology outlined in Pittore, Haas and Silva (2019) "Multi-resolution Probabilistic Modelling of Residential Exposure and Vulnerability for Seismic Risk Applications", Earthquake Spectra. The model is aggregated over a Central Voronoidal Tessellation (CVT) composed of geo-cells covering the territory of Uzbekistan (provided as a separate file). The model prior is based on empirical observations in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan as well as user-elicited knowledge. The following specific modelling parameters have been employed: Two exposure models are provided, with prior strength pw 10 and 100. Both models have epsilon=0.001 (see publication indicated in the metadata for details on the modelling process). For each geo-cell the model includes the expected number of buildings , total occupancy and replacement cost for each of the 15 building types defined in the EMCA taxonomy (see Pittore et al, 2019b), plus the buildings that are belonging to other, non specified typologies (described by building type OTH). Each geo-cell also includes the area of the geo-cell itself in squared km. The data package contains three components: 1) exposure models in .csv 2) exposure models in .xml - the file is encoded in NRML 0.5 format and is compatible with the GEM openquake processing engine 3) shapefile of the tessellation that aggregates the exposure model. The field "cell_id" is the linkage with the exposure models

Remote Rapid Visual survey (RRVS) for exposure modelling in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

The dataset contains a set of structural and non-structural attributes collected using the GFZ RRVS methodology in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, within the framework of the projects EMCA (Earthquake Model Central Asia), funded by GEM, and "Assessing Seismic Risk in the Kyrgyz Republic", funded by the World Bank. The survey has been carried out between 2012 and 2016 using a Remote Rapid Visual Screening system developed by GFZ and employing omnidirectional images and footprints from OpenStreetMap. The attributes are encoded according to the GEM taxonomy v2.0 (see https://taxonomy.openquake.org). The following attributes are defined (not all are observable in the RRVS survey): code, description: lon, longitude in fraction of degrees lat, latitude in fraction of degrees object_id, unique id of the building surveyed MAT_TYPE,Material Type MAT_TECH,Material Technology MAT_PROP,Material Property LLRS,Type of Lateral Load-Resisting System LLRS_DUCT,System Ductility HEIGHT,Height YR_BUILT,Date of Construction or Retrofit OCCUPY,Building Occupancy Class - General OCCUPY_DT,Building Occupancy Class - Detail POSITION,Building Position within a Block PLAN_SHAPE,Shape of the Building Plan STR_IRREG,Regular or Irregular STR_IRREG_DT,Plan Irregularity or Vertical Irregularity STR_IRREG_TYPE,Type of Irregularity NONSTRCEXW,Exterior walls ROOF_SHAPE,Roof Shape ROOFCOVMAT,Roof Covering ROOFSYSMAT,Roof System Material ROOFSYSTYP,Roof System Type ROOF_CONN,Roof Connections FLOOR_MAT,Floor Material FLOOR_TYPE,Floor System Type FLOOR_CONN,Floor Connections For each building an EMCA vulnerability class has been assigned following the fuzzy scoring methodology described in Pittore et al., 2018. The related class definition schema (as a .json document) is included in the data package.

1 2