To seismically monitor the GEOREAL hydraulic stimulation experiment, that took place during the period 6-15 November 2023, a station network was set up in the vicinity of the Kontinentale Tiefbohrung/ KTB deep crustal lab near Windischeschenbach, Germany. The network comprised both surface stations, shallow borehole (25-150 m deep) stations as well as a borehole chain at 2000 m depth in the main borehole, ca. 200m apart from the pilot borehole. First stations were installed in early 2022 and removed in mid-2024. A total of 600 m³ of water was injected into the 4 km deep pilot borehole (KTB-VB, 12° 7.16' E, 49° 48.98' N, 513.418 m above NN ). This volume was injected through a stuck packer in the cased borehole into the open borehole section a depth of 3.85-4 km. No induced seismicity was observed during the injection experiment. Waveform data is available from the GEOFON data centre, under network code 4R, and is fully open.
This data publication contains seismic catalog developed by the analysis of seismicity recorded during hydraulic stimulation campaign performed in May 2020 in the 5.8-km deep OTN-2 well near Helsinki, Finland as part of the St1 Deep Heat project (Kwiatek et al., 2022). The original seismic data to develop the seismic catalog were acquired with the high-resolution seismic network composed of 22 geophones surrounding the project site. The centerpiece of the network was a 10-level borehole array of Geospace OMNI-2400 geophones (3C/15 Hz) sampled at 2 kHz placed in the OTN-3 well adjacent to the OTN-2 injection well, and located at 1.93 - 2.55 km depth, approx. 3km from injection intervals. Additional 12 stations at distances <10 km from project site formed the satellite network that was equipped with short-period 3C 4.5 Hz Sunfull PSH geophones, completing the seismic network. Near-real-time processing of induced seismicity data started on Jan 26, 2020, i.e. about 3 months prior to the onset of the injection, covering entire period of the stimulation campaign in May 2020. The monitoring stopped end of June 2020, about one month after the stimulation finished. The monitoring campaign resulted in initial industrial seismicity catalog containing 6,243 events that was refined and further extended (cf. Kwiatek et al., 2022). The final catalog associated with this data publication contains 6,318 earthquakes, including 197, 5427 and 694 events recorded before, during, and after stimulation campaign. The core catalog data contains origin time, local magnitude, (re)location and focal mechanism data.
Mean S-wave coda quality factors (mean-Qc) were estimated from active ultrasonic transmission (UT) measurements acquired during the STIMTEC project in the URL Reiche Zeche (Saxony, Germany). We used S-coda waves of 88 selected UT measurements carried out in 3 differently oriented boreholes (BH10, BH12, BH16) to estimate the spatial change of the coda quality factor in the targeted rock volume, an anisotropic metamorphic gneiss. We also analysed temporal variation in attenuation before and after hydraulic stimulations performed in two boreholes (BH10, BH17). We formed in total 8 UT groups (see data table "2022-004_Blanke-and-Boese_mean_UT_event_locations") from neighbouring UT measurements within different depths and from separated time intervals (see also Tab. 1 in Blanke et al. 2023), and compare mean-Qc estimates of centre frequencies ranging 3-21 kHz of octave-width frequency bands. Our results show a characteristic frequency-dependence and we find that mean-Qc estimates reveal temporal-variations of attenuation more significantly than those obtained from velocity measurements. The temporal variations are strongly connected to hydraulic stimulation activities resulting in a reduction of the coda quality factor where AE events occurred. Analysis of mean-Qc estimates after a temporal resting phase (with no activity in the rock volume) suggests that frequencies > 15 kHz indicate healing of small-scale fractures induced by injections. The study shows that coda analysis is a powerful tool for the detection of damage zones and for monitoring changes of the local fracture network within reservoirs important for exploitation or underground storage of gases and liquids.
This data set contains measurements of an underground hydraulic fracture experiment at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory in May and June 2015. The experiment tested various injection schemes for rock fracture stimulation and monitored the resulting seismicity. The primary purpose of the experiment is to identify injection schemes that provide rock fracturing while reducing seismicity or at least mitigate larger seismic events. In total, six tests with three different injection schemes were performed in various igneous rock types. Both the injection process and the accompanied seismicity were monitored. For injection monitoring, the water flow and pressure are provided and additional tests for rock permeability. The seismicity was monitored in both triggered and continuous mode during the tests by high-resolution acoustic emission sensors, accelerometers and broadband seismometers. Both waveform data and seismicity catalogs are provided.
This data publication contains seismic waveform data of 507 earthquakes recorded during the St1 Deep Heat project in June and July 2018, where the 6.1 km deep OTN-3 well near Helsinki, Finland, was hydraulically stimulated over 49 days (Kwiatek et al., 2019). The waveforms were recorded on a surrounding seismic monitoring network consisting of 12 stations, deployed at epicentral distances between 0.6 to 8.2 km and at depths between 0.23 to 1.15 km. Each station consists of three-component, 4.5 Hz, Sunfull PSH geophones, sampling at 500 Hz. The 507 earthquakes analysed were chosen from the relocated event catalogue by Leonhardt et al. (2021a). The dataset is supplementary material to the Geophysical Research Letters research article of Holmgren et al. (2022), which applied the Empirical Green’s Function technique to examine microseismic rupture behaviour at the Helsinki site.
Other
In 2020 and 2021 the STIMTEC-X hydraulic stimulation experiment was performed at ca.~130 m below surface at the Reiche Zeche underground research laboratory in Freiberg, Saxony/Germany. The project temporally followed the STIMTEC experiment at the same site and aimed at understanding the stress heterogeneity of the anisotropic and metamorphic gneiss rock mass. The STIMTEC-X experiment applied the hydraulic stimulation technique in several boreholes at the mine-scale. Complementary to the stimulations, there were active seismic ultrasonic transmission data acquired before the stimulations. We use a seismic monitoring network consisting of six single-component acoustic emission (AE) sensors (sensitivity 1-60 kHz), six hydrophone-like AE sensors (sensitivity 1-40 kHz) and four to twelve single-component Wilcoxon accelerometers (sensitivity 50 Hz-25 kHz). The AE sensors and remained stationary in sub-horizontal and upwards reaching boreholes, the accelerometers were mostly installed along the tunnel walls with one accelerometer in a shallow borehole in each tunnel, and the hydrophone-like AE sensors were installed in the down-going water filled boreholes, but repositioned for each measurement campaign (Figure 1). This data set of 120 active ultrasonic transmission (UT) measurements is supplementary to Boese et al. (2022, in review), which introduces some of the active measurement campaigns of the STIMTEC-X experiment in detail. The whole data set togetter with the “Ultrasonic transmission measurements from six boreholes from the STIMTEC experiment, Reiche Zeche Mine, Freiberg (Saxony, Germany)” [https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.2.2021.002] was used to evaluate performance measures such as sensitivity and frequency bandwith, coupling, placement and polarity of the hydrophone-like AE sensor compared to AE sensors. The active seismic data provided here are from seven boreholes (BH01, BH05, BH06, BH10, BH14, BH18, BH19) as shown in Figure 1. There are nine tables provided as metadata of which seven contain the STIMTEC-X sensor coordinates for each measurement campaign, the event information of all the 120 UT measurements and the UT picks. The UT measurements were recorded with a sampling rate of 1 MHz and results from an automatic stack of 1024 UT pulses generated by the ultrasonic transmitter and recorded by the STIMTEC-X sensors. The UT measurements are saved in binary file format (fsf file format). Fsf-files can be processed with FOCI software: https://www.induced.pl/software/foci. Each fsf file contains 32768 samples, which corresponds to 0.032768 seconds. All UT event files were manual inspected and phase arrivals identified. These are stored in the fsf-file header as well as in the table STIMTECX_UT_picks.csv.
Between early 2018 and late 2019 the STIMTEC hydraulic stimulation experiment was performed at ca.~130 m below surface at the Reiche Zeche underground research laboratory in Freiberg, Saxony/Germany. The project aimed at gaining insight into the creation and growth of fractures in anisotropic and heterogeneous metamorphic gneiss , to develop and optimise hydraulic stimulation techniques and to control the associated induced seismicity under in situ conditions at the mine-scale. These aspects of failure and associated seismicity are important for the development of enhanced geothermal energy systems. A combined seismic network consisted of 12 single-component acoustic emission sensors (sensitivity 1-100 kHz) and three single-component Wilcoxon accelerometers (sensitivity 50 Hz-25 kHz) were installed in boreholes drilled into the test volume, surrounding the stimulation site (Figure 1). A stimulation borehole with 63 m length was drilled with 15° northward inclination. This data set of 314 active ultrasonic transmission (UT) measurements is supplementary to Boese et al. (2021, in review), which introduces the STIMTEC experiment and its active measurement campaigns. This data set was used to derive an anisotropic velocity model for the STIMTEC rock volume. The active seismic data provided here are from six boreholes (BH09, BH10, BH12, BH15, BH16, BH17) as shown in Figure 1. of the associated data description. There are three tables provided as metadata that contain the STIMTEC sensor coordinates, event information of the 314 UT measurements and the UT picks. The UT measurements were recorded with a sampling rate of 1 MHz and results from an automatic stack of 1024 UT pulses generated by the ultrasonic transmitter and recorded by the STIMTEC sensors. The UT measurements are saved in binary file format (fsf file format). Fsf-files can be processed with FOCI software: https://www.induced.pl/software/foci Each fsf file contains 32768 samples, which corresponds to 0.032768 seconds. All UT event files were manual inspected and phase arrivals identified. These are stored in the fsf-file header as well as in the table STIMTEC_UT_picks.csv.
Ziel des Verbundprojekts GEOSMART ist es, eine transparente und standortunabhängige Methode zur Risikobewertung von hydrothermalen und petrothermalen Tiefengeothermieprojekten sowie von Speicherprojekten auf Grundlage einer modularen Simulation des Gesamtsystems zu entwickeln. Üblicherweise wird bei Risikoanalysen zunächst eine Reihe konzeptioneller Vereinfachungen vorgenommen, um komplexe Prozesse im Rahmen probabilistischer Ansätze beschreiben zu können. Für das Projekt GEOSMART wurde ein entgegengesetzter Ansatz gewählt. Es ist beabsichtigt, die erforderlichen Prozessmodelle zunächst entsprechend dem aktuellen Stand von Wissenschaft und Technik einschließlich der Prozesskopplung zu entwickeln. Im Anschluss werden für die Prozessmodelle mittels Sensitivitätsanalysen die Schlüsselparameter identifiziert, die den größten Einfluss auf die einzelnen Risikokomponenten haben. Die Abhängigkeit der Risikokomponenten von den Schlüsselparametern wird dann in Form von Wertetabellen bzw. Antwortfunktionen abgebildet und an ein zentrales Systemsimulationsmodell übergeben, mit dem die Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilung für die einzelnen Risikokomponenten berechnet wird. Die Schnittstelle über die Wertetabellen bzw. Antwortfunktionen stellt die wesentliche Vereinfachung dar und ermöglicht eine probabilistische Simulation komplexer Modelle. Der entscheidende Vorteil gegenüber herkömmlichen Risikoanalysen besteht darin, dass die relevanten Prozesse nicht auf Grundlage stark vereinfachter Modelle abgebildet werden, was die Genauigkeit von Prognosen deutlich erhöht. Das Projekt GEOSMART gliedert sich in fünf Arbeitspakete. Im Rahmen des ersten Arbeitspaketes wird mit Hilfe des Programmpaketes GoldSim ein zentrales Systemsimulationsmodell entwickelt, an das sämtliche Prozessmodelle über Schnittstellen gekoppelt werden. Das zweite Arbeitspaket befasst sich mit einem Prozessmodell zur Integrität des Deckgebirges und den Auswirkungen von unkontrolliertem Risswachstum im Rahmen der hydraulischen Stimulation. Hierfür sind gekoppelte strömungsmechanische Simulationen vorgesehen. Im dritten Arbeitspaket wird die Migration von Fluiden aus einem Reservoir über geologische Schwächezonen betrachtet. Dabei wird mit dem Prozessmodell insbesondere der Stoff- und Wärmetransport quantifiziert. Änderungen des Spannungsfeldes und die dadurch möglicherweise induzierte Seismizität stehen im Zentrum des vierten Arbeitspaketes. Es ist geplant, mit einem Prozessmodell Wertetabellen für die Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit solcher Ereignisse und Erschütterungskarten zu liefern. Im fünften Arbeitspaket wird die Integrität von Bohrungssystemen untersucht. Unter Berücksichtigung aller relevanten Prozesse erfolgt die Quantifizierung von Fluidleckagen für das Gesamtsystem Bohrung mithilfe gekoppelter numerischer Simulationen. (Text gekürzt)
Origin | Count |
---|---|
Bund | 20 |
Wissenschaft | 13 |
Type | Count |
---|---|
Förderprogramm | 18 |
Text | 2 |
unbekannt | 9 |
License | Count |
---|---|
geschlossen | 3 |
offen | 26 |
Language | Count |
---|---|
Deutsch | 18 |
Englisch | 11 |
Resource type | Count |
---|---|
Dokument | 2 |
Keine | 12 |
Webseite | 16 |
Topic | Count |
---|---|
Boden | 21 |
Lebewesen & Lebensräume | 12 |
Luft | 13 |
Mensch & Umwelt | 29 |
Wasser | 9 |
Weitere | 28 |