API src

Found 404 results.

Related terms

Regionales Raumordnungsprogramm 2020 Landkreis Rotenburg (Wümme)

Rechtskräftiges Regionales Raumordnungsprogramm des Landkreises Rotenburg (Wümme) in zeichnerischer Darstellung. Das Regionale Raumordnungsprogramm ist aus dem Landesraumordnungsprogramm (LROP) 2017 entwickelt und legt die angestrebte räumliche und strukturelle Entwicklung des Planungsraumes fest.

Regionaler Entwicklungsplan 2018

Regionaler Entwicklungsplan für die Planungsregion Anhalt-Bitterfeld-Wittenberg mit den Planinhalten „Raumstruktur, Standortpotenziale, technische Infrastruktur und Freiraumstruktur“ Die oberste Landesentwicklungsbehörde hat am 21.12.2018 die Genehmigung unter einer Maßgabe erteilt. Am 29.03.2019 trat die Regionalversammlung mit Beschluss Nr. 03/2019 der Maßgabe bei. Mit Bekanntmachung der Genehmigung trat der Regionale Entwicklungsplan am 27.04.2019 in Kraft.

INSPIRE: Information system salt structures: planning basis, selection criteria and estimation of the potential for the construction of salt caverns for the storage of renewable energies (hydrogen and compressed air) (InSpEE) (WMS)

The WMS InSpEE (INSPIRE) provides information about the areal distribution of salt structures (salt domes and salt pillows) in Northern Germany. Contours of the salt structures can be displayed at horizontal cross-sections at four different depths up to a maximum depth of 2000 m below NN. The geodata have resulted from a BMWi-funded research project “InSpEE” running from the year 2012 to 2015. The acronym stands for "Information system salt structures: planning basis, selection criteria and estimation of the potential for the construction of salt caverns for the storage of renewable energies (hydrogen and compressed air)”. Taking into account the fact that this work was undertaken at a scale for providing an overview and not for investigation of single structures, the scale of display is limited to a minimum of 1:300.000. Additionally four horizontal cross-section maps display the stratigraphical situation at a given depth. In concurrence of maps at different depths areal bedding conditions can be determined, e.g. to generally assess and interpret the spread of different stratigraphic units. Clearly visible are extent and shape of the salt structures within their regional context at the different depths, with extent and boundary of the salt structures having been the main focus of the project. Four horizontal cross-section maps covering the whole onshore area of Northern Germany have been developed at a scale of 1:500.000. The maps cover the depths of -500, -1000, -1500, -2000 m below NN. The four depths are based on typical depth requirements of existing salt caverns in Northern Germany, mainly related to hydrocarbon storage. The shapes of the structures show rudimentary information of their geometry and their change with depths. In addition they form the starting point for rock mechanical calculations necessary for the planning and construction of salt caverns for storage as well as for assessing storage potentials. The maps can be used as a pre-selection tool for subsurface uses. It can also be used to assess coverage and extension of salt structures. Offshore areas were not treated within the project. All horizontal cross-section maps were adjusted with the respective state geological survey organisations. According to the Data Specification on Geology (D2.8.II.4_v3.0) the WMS InSpEE (INSPIRE) provides INSPIRE-compliant data. The WMS InSpEE (INSPIRE) contains two group layers: The first group layer “INSPIRE: Salt structures in Northern Germany“ comprises the layers GE.Geologic.Unit.Salt structure types, GE.GeologicUnit.Salt pillow remnants, GE.GeologicUnit.Structure-building salinar and GE.GeologicUnit.Structural outlines. The layer GE.GeologicUnit.Structural outlines contains according to the four depths four sublayers, e.g. GE.GeologiUnit.Structural outlines 500 m below NN. The second group layer „INSPIRE: Horizontal cross-section maps of Northern Germany“ comprises according to the four depths four layers, e.g. Horizontal cross-section map – 500 m below NN. This layer, in turns, contains two sublayers: GE.GeologicFault.Relevant fault traces and GE.GeologicUnit.Stratigraphic Units. Via the getFeatureInfo request the user obtains additional information on the different geometries. In case of the GE.Geologic.Unit.Salt structure types the user gets access to a data sheet with additional information and further reading in German for the respective salt structure via the getFeatureInfo request.

CO2 storage potential of the Jurassic within the German Central Graben

Within the framework of the GEOSTOR Project, the CO2 storage potential of the Jurassic succession in the German Central Graben was analysed. Twelve potential trap structures were initially mapped along the base of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, which serves as the primary seal for potential reservoir sandstones within the Central Graben Subgroup. The Kimmeridge Clay Formation is generally continuously distributed across the German Central Graben, with only localized penetrations by rising salt diapirs. In contrast, the Central Graben Subgroup, serving as a potential reservoir unit, exhibits an uneven distribution across the area, limiting the presence and continuity of reservoir rocks within each trap structure. To further delineate the spatial extent of the mapped reservoir structures, the base of the Central Graben Subgroup was used as an additional reference layer. Due to the intermittent nature of Jurassic sandstones within the Central Graben Subgroup, a subsequent analysis classified each structure based on borehole data to confirm the presence of reservoir sands. Structures were categorized as ‘proven,’ ‘not present,’ or ‘uncertain’ depending on sandstone availability and continuity within the trap. All mapped reservoir structures are buried at depths ranging from 2225 to 3043 meters (apex depth) and are considered closed systems, situated within a complex structural network of salt diapirs, faults, and pinch-outs. Capacity calculations were conducted following the method outlined by Fuhrmann et al. (2024), and the horizons used for mapping are based on the work of Müller et al. (2023) and Thöle et al. (2021). Fuhrmann, A., Knopf, S., Thöle, H., Kästner, F., Ahlrichs, N., Stück, H.L., Schlieder-Kowitz, A., Kuhlmann, G., (2024). CO2 storage potential of the Middle Buntsandstein Subgroup-German sector of the North Sea. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 136. Müller, S.M., Jähne-Klingberg, F., Thöle, H., Jakobsen, F.C., Bense, F., Winsemann, J. & Gaedicke, C. (2023). Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous tectonostratigraphy of the German Central Graben, southern North Sea. – Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 102: e4. DOI:10.1017/njg.2023.4 Thöle, H., Jähne-Klingberg, F., Doornenbal, H., den Dulk, M., Britze, P. & Jakobsen F. (2021). Deliverable 3.8 – Harmonized depth models and structural framework of the NL-GER-DK North Sea. GEOERA 3DGEO-EU; 3D Geomodeling for Europe; project number GeoE.171.005. Report.

Forschungsprogramm Experimenteller Wohnungs- und Städtebau (ExWoSt), Modellprojekt Stadt Regensburg

Ausgangslage/Betroffenheit: Die Stadt Regensburg hat etwa 134.000 Einwohner (Erstwohnsitze) und ist damit die viertgrößte Stadt Bayerns. Unter den Modellvorhaben weist Regensburg das stärkste Bevölkerungswachstum auf - sowohl in der zurückliegenden Einwohnerentwicklung als auch in den Prognosen bis 2025, nach denen ein Anstieg der Bevölkerung um 5,4Prozent erwartet wird. Regensburg liegt am nördlichsten Punkt der Donau und den Mündungen der linken Nebenflüsse Naab und Regen. Es wird von den Winzerer Höhen, den Ausläufern des Bayrischen Waldes und dem Ziegetsberg umrandet, wodurch die Entstehung von Inversionswetterlagen begünstigt wird. Durch die topographische Pfortenlage weist die Stadt zudem eine hohe Nebelhäufigkeit auf und ist insbesondere in den Wintermonaten anfällig für Feinstaubbelastungen. Im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen Städten hat Regensburg einen relativ kompakt gegliederten Stadtkörper und eine insgesamt homogene Siedlungsstruktur. Prägend ist die historische Altstadt mit ca. 1.000 denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden. Diese gilt als einzige authentisch erhaltene, mittelalterliche Großstadt Deutschlands und ist seit 2006 Welterbe der UNESCO (Organisation der Vereinten Nationen für Erziehung, Wissenschaft und Kultur). Die Regensburger Altstadt wird als 'Steinerne Stadt' charakterisiert. Ihre historisch gewachsene dichte Baustruktur mit steinernen Plätzen und Gassen, wenig Bäumen im öffentlichen Raum und einer hohen Nutzungsdichte (Wohnen, Einkaufen, Arbeiten, Tourismus) erwärmt sich insbesondere im Sommer stärker als das Umland und wirkt als Hitzespeicher. So können die Temperaturunterschiede im Stadtgebiet bis zu 6 GradC betragen. Das Phänomen der Wärmeinsel, das sich im Zuge des fortschreitenden Klimawandels deutlicher ausprägt, impliziert einen sinkenden thermischen Komfort, löst zusätzliche Energiebedarfe aus und stellt u.U. veränderte Ansprüche an die Gestaltung von Freiflächen. Aufgrund der Lage an der Donau muss sich Regensburg ferner auf häufigere Schwüle und Gefährdung durch Hochwasser einstellen. Aus der Notwendigkeit zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel erwächst in Verbindung mit anderen Zielbildern einer nachhaltigen Siedlungsentwicklung ein umfassender planerischer Handlungsbedarf. Im Rahmen des Modellprojekts thematisiert die Stadt Regensburg den Widerspruch zwischen einer Stadtentwicklungs- und Bauleitplanung, die auf Flächensparsamkeit und Innenentwicklung ausgerichtet ist, und erforderlichen Anpassungsstrategien an den Klimawandel, die bei der besonderen städtebaulichen Kompaktheit der Stadt Regensburg tendenziell eine Auflockerung von Baustrukturen und Flächenentsiegelung beinhalten. Im Sinne einer klimaangepassten Stadtentwicklung galt es: - auf strategischer Ebene die Weichen für eine klimaangepasste Flächennutzung für die zukünftige Stadtentwicklung zu stellen - auf operativer Ebene Maßnahmen für restriktive bis persistente Stadt- und Freiraumstrukturen zu entwickeln.

Textteil Regionalplan, rechtskräftig (Region Südwestsachsen)

Inhaltsverzeichnis des Textteils des rechtskräftigen Regionalplanes in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 16.08.2007: I Allgemeine Grundsätze der Regionalentwicklung 1 Leitbild der Region II Überfachliche Grundsätze und Ziele zur Entwicklung der Raumstruktur 2 Regionale Raum- und Siedlungsstruktur 2.1 Gebietskategorien und Raumstruktur 2.2 Grundsätze und Ziele für die regionale Siedlungsentwicklung 2.3 Zentrale Orte 3 Regionale Freiraumstruktur 3.1 Leitbilder für Natur und Landschaft 3.2 Grundsätze und Ziele zur Erhaltung und Entwicklung der regionalen Freiraumstruktur und des Naturhaushaltes 3.3 Freiraum und Siedlung 3.5 Sanierungsbedürftige Bereiche der Landschaft III Fachliche Grundsätze und Ziele zur regionalen Entwicklung 4 Regionale Wirtschaftsstruktur 4.1 Grundsätze und Ziele zur räumlichen Entwicklung von Industrie und Gewerbe 4.2 Grundsätze und Ziele zur räumlichen Entwicklung des Handels 4.3 Grundsätze und Ziele zur räumlichen Entwicklung der Land- und Forstwirtschaft 4.4 Grundsätze und Ziele zur räumlichen Entwicklung der Gewinnung oberflächennaher Rohstoffe 4.5 Grundsätze und Ziele zur regionalen Entwicklung von Tourismus und Erholung 5 Bereiche der Daseinsvorsorge 6 Verkehr und Nachrichtenwesen 6.1 Grundsätze und Ziele zur Entwicklung des Verkehrswesens in der Region 6.2 Öffentlicher Personennahverkehr (ÖPNV) 6.3 Schienenverkehr 6.4 Straßenverkehr 6.5 Ziviler Luftverkehr 6.6 Radverkehr 6.7 Telekommunikation und Postwesen 7 Technische Infrastruktur und Umwelttechnik 7.1 Wasser 7.2 Energie 7.3 Abfallwirtschaft

Urban-industrielle Oekosysteme

Untersuchung der verschiedenen physischen Bestandteile staedtischer Oekosysteme unter Beruecksichtigung der Raumstruktur: Klima, Boden, Wasserhaushalt in ihrer Beziehung zur Stadtstruktur sowie spontane und subspontane Vegetation in ihrer raeumlichen Differenzierung und ihrem Indikatorwert. Eine besondere Aufgabe besteht in der Erforschung der oekologischen Ausgleichswirkung von Freiflaechen bei einer gegebenen Belastungssituation in der Staedte- und Industrieregion des Ruhrgebietes, Raum Gelsenkirchen/Herten (Ausgleichsfunktion fuer Klima, Wasserhaushalt sowie Biotopfunktion). Weiterhin wird versucht, die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse und Daten in das bestehende Planungsinstrumentarium einzubringen (etwa ueber UVP) und so Grundlagen fuer eine oekologisch orientierte Planung zu schaffen. Ein zweiter Schwerpunkt liegt in der Erfassung und Bewertung der Boeden im urban-industriellen Oekosystem (Castrop-Rauxel, Bochum).

Biogenic soil structures: feedbacks between bioactivity and spatial heterogeneity of water storage and fluxes from plot to hillslope scale

Soil structure determines a large part of the spatial heterogeneity in water storage and fluxes from the plot to the hillslope scale. In recent decades important progress in hydrological research has been achieved by including soil structure in hydrological models. One of the main problems herein remains the difficulty of measuring soil structure and quantifying its influence on hydrological processes. As soil structure is very often of biogenic origin (macropores), the main objective of this project is to use the influence of bioactivity and resulting soil structures to describe and support modelling of hydrological processes at different scales. Therefore, local scale bioactivity will be linked to local infiltration patterns under varying catchment conditions. At hillslope scale, the spatial distribution of bioactivity patterns will be linked to connectivity of subsurface structures to explain subsurface stormflow generation. Then we will apply species distribution modelling of key organisms in order to extrapolate the gained knowledge to the catchment scale. As on one hand, bioactivity influences the hydrological processes, but on the other hand the species distribution also depends on soil moisture contents, including the feedbacks between bioactivity and soil hydrology is pivotal for getting reliable predictions of catchment scale hydrological behavior under land use change and climate change.

Spatial heterogeneity and substrate availability as limiting factors for subsoil C-turnover

In subsoils, organic matter (SOM) concentrations and microbial densities are much lower than in topsoils and most likely highly heterogeneously distributed. We therefore hypothesize, that the spatial separation between consumers (microorganisms) and their substrates (SOM) is an important limiting factor for carbon turnover in subsoils. Further, we expect microbial activity to occur mainly in few hot spots, such as the rhizosphere or flow paths where fresh substrate inputs are rapidly mineralized. In a first step, the spatial distribution of enzyme and microbial activities in top- and subsoils will be determined in order to identify hot spots and relate this to apparent 14C age, SOM composition, microbial community composition and soil properties, as determined by the other projects within the research unit. In a further step it will be determined, if microbial activity and SOM turnover is limited by substrate availability in spatially distinct soil microsites. By relating this data to root distribution and preferential flow paths we will contribute to the understanding of stabilizing and destabilizing processes of subsoil organic matter. As it is unclear, at which spatial scale these differentiating processes are effective, the analysis of spatial variability will cover the dm to the mm scale. As spatial segregation between consumers and substrates will depend on the pore and aggregate architecture of the soil, the role of the physical integrity of these structures on SOM turnover will also be investigated in laboratory experiments.

Analysis of dairy production systems differentiated by location

Dairy farming across Germany displays diverse production systems. Factor endowment, management, technology adoption as well as competitive dynamics in the local or regional land, agribusiness and dairy processing sectors contribute to this differentiation on farm level. These differences impact on the ability of dairy farms and regional dairy production systems to successfully respond to pressures arising from future market and policy changes. The overall objective of the research activities of which this project is a part of, is to develop a thorough understanding of the processes that govern the spatial dynamics of dairy farm development in different regions in Germany. The central hypothesis of this research project is that management system and technological choices differ systematically across local production and market conditions. The empirical approach will focus on the estimation of farm specific nonparametric cost functions for dairy farms located in across Germany differentiated by time and location. A spatially differentiated data base with information on input use, resource availability, as well as local market conditions for land and output markets will be compiled. The nonparametric approach is specifically suited to disclose a more accurate representation of dairy production system heterogeneity across locations and time compared to parametric concepts as it provides the necessary flexibility to accommodate non-linearities relevant for a wide domain of explanatory variables. The methodology employed goes beyond the state of the art of the literature as it combines kernel density estimation with a Bayesian sampling approach to provide theory consistent parameters for each farm in the data sample.The specific methodological hypothesis is that the nonparametric approach is superior to current parametric techniques and this hypothesis is tested using statistical model evaluation. Regarding the farm management and technological choices, we hypothesize that land suitability for feed production determines the farm intensity of dairy production and thus management and technological choices. With respect to the ability of farms to successfully respond to market pressures we hypothesize that farms at the upper and lower tail of the intensity distribution both can generate positive returns from dairy production. These last two hypotheses will be tested using the estimated spatially differentiated farm specific costs and marginal costs.The expected outcomes are of relevance for the agricultural sector and the food supply chain economy as a whole as fundamental market structure changes in the dairy sector are ongoing due to the abolition of the quota regulation in the years 2014/2015. Thus, exact knowledge about differences and development of dairy cost heterogeneity of farms within and between regions are an important factor for the actors involved in the market as well as the political support of this process.

1 2 3 4 539 40 41