Soil cores for microbial, dissolved gas concentrations and isotopic analysis were taken using a Russian type peat corer (De Vleeschouwer et al. 2010) before and after rewetting. Each time, we took duplicates at stations 1-8 for this rather labor-intensive process and divided the core into four depth sections: surface, 5–20, 20–40 and 40–50 cm. Subsamples for dissolved gases and stable carbon isotope analyses were taken with tip-cut syringes with a distinct volume of 3 ml (Omnifix, Braun, Bad Arolsen, Germany) and immediately placed into NaCl-saturated vials (20 ml, Agilent Technologies, 5182-0837, Santa Clara, USA) leaving no headspace and closed gas-tight using rubber stoppers and metal crimpers (both: diameter 20 mm, Glasgerätebau Ochs, Bovenden, Germany).
Der Datensatz Agricultural And Aquaculture Facilities / Tierhaltungs- und Aufzuchtanlagen in Brandenburg ist die Datengrundlage der interoperablen INSPIRE-Darstellungs- (WMS) und Downloaddienste (WFS): Tierhaltungsanlagen nach BImSchG in Brandenburg - Interoperabler INSPIRE View-Service (WMS-AF-TIERE) Tierhaltungsanlagen nach BImSchG in Brandenburg - Interoperabler INSPIRE Download-Service (WFS-AF-TIERE) Der Datenbestand beinhaltet die Punktdaten zu den betriebenen Tierhaltungsanlagen aus dem Anlageninformationssystem LIS-A. Die Angaben zu den Anlagen enthalten jeweils den Standort und die genehmigte Leistung. Dabei erfolgte eine sog. Schematransformation und Belegung der INSPIRE-relevanten Attribute. Der Datensatz Agricultural And Aquaculture Facilities / Tierhaltungs- und Aufzuchtanlagen in Brandenburg ist die Datengrundlage der interoperablen INSPIRE-Darstellungs- (WMS) und Downloaddienste (WFS): Tierhaltungsanlagen nach BImSchG in Brandenburg - Interoperabler INSPIRE View-Service (WMS-AF-TIERE) Tierhaltungsanlagen nach BImSchG in Brandenburg - Interoperabler INSPIRE Download-Service (WFS-AF-TIERE) Der Datenbestand beinhaltet die Punktdaten zu den betriebenen Tierhaltungsanlagen aus dem Anlageninformationssystem LIS-A. Die Angaben zu den Anlagen enthalten jeweils den Standort und die genehmigte Leistung. Dabei erfolgte eine sog. Schematransformation und Belegung der INSPIRE-relevanten Attribute. Der Datensatz Agricultural And Aquaculture Facilities / Tierhaltungs- und Aufzuchtanlagen in Brandenburg ist die Datengrundlage der interoperablen INSPIRE-Darstellungs- (WMS) und Downloaddienste (WFS): Tierhaltungsanlagen nach BImSchG in Brandenburg - Interoperabler INSPIRE View-Service (WMS-AF-TIERE) Tierhaltungsanlagen nach BImSchG in Brandenburg - Interoperabler INSPIRE Download-Service (WFS-AF-TIERE) Der Datenbestand beinhaltet die Punktdaten zu den betriebenen Tierhaltungsanlagen aus dem Anlageninformationssystem LIS-A. Die Angaben zu den Anlagen enthalten jeweils den Standort und die genehmigte Leistung. Dabei erfolgte eine sog. Schematransformation und Belegung der INSPIRE-relevanten Attribute.
Der interoprable INSPIRE-Viewdienst (WMS) Agricultural and Aquaculture Facilities gibt einen Überblick über die Tierhaltungs- und Aufzuchtanlagen im Land Brandenburg. Der Datensatz umfasst Geflügel, Rinder, Kälber, Schweine und gemischte Bestände. Die Datenquelle ist das Anlageninformationssystem LIS-A. Gemäß der INSPIRE-Datenspezifikation Agricultural and Aquaculture Facilities (D2.8.III.9_v3.0) liegen die Inhalte INSPIRE-konform vor. Der WMS beinhaltet 2 Layer: AgriculturalHolding und Sites. Der Holding-Layer wird gem. INSPIRE-Vorgaben nach Wirstschaftszweigen (NACE-Kategorie "A") untergliedert in: - AF.GrowingOfPerennialCrops: Anbau mehrjähriger Pflanzen (NACE-Kategorie "A.01.2") - AF.AnimalProduction: Tierhaltung (NACE-Kategorie "A.01.4") - AF.MixedFarming: Gemischte Landwirtschaft (NACE-Kategorie "A.01.5")
This dataset contains geochemical variables measured in six depth profiles from ombrotrophic peatlands in North and Central Europe. Peat cores were taken during the spring and summer of 2022 from Amtsvenn (AV1), Germany; Drebbersches Moor (DM1), Germany; Fochteloër Veen (FV1), the Netherlands; Bagno Kusowo (KR1), Poland; Pichlmaier Moor (PI1), Austria and Pürgschachen Moor (PM1), Austria. The cores AV1, DM1 and KR1 were taken using a Wardenaar sampler (Royal Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, the Netherlands) and had diameter of 10 cm. The cores FV1, PM1 and PI1 had an 8 cm diameter and were obtained using an Instorf sampler (Royal Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, the Netherlands). The cores FV1, DM1 and KR1 were 100 cm, core AV1 was 95 cm, core PI1 was 85 cm and core PM1 was 200 cm. The cores were subsampeled in 1 cm (AV1, DM1, KR1, FV1) and 2 cm (PI1, PM1) sections. The subsamples were milled after freeze drying in a ballmill using tungen carbide accesoires. X-Ray Fluorescence (WD-XRF; ZSX Primus II, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine Al (μg g-1), As (μg g-1), Ba (μg g-1), Br (μg g-1), Ca (g g-1), Cl (μg g-1), Cr (μg g-1), Cu (μg g-1), Fe (g g-1), K (g g-1), Mg (μg g-1), Mn (μg g-1), Na (μg g-1), P (μg g-1), Pb (μg g-1), Rb (μg g-1), S (μg g-1), Si (μg g-1), Sr (μg g-1), Ti (μg g-1) and Zn (μg g-1). These data were processed and calibrated using the iloekxrf package (Teickner & Knorr, 2024) in R. C, N and their stable isotopes were determined using an elemental analyser linked to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA-3000, Eurovector, Pavia, Italy & Nu Horizon, Nu Instruments, Wrexham, UK). C and N were given in units g g-1 and stable isotopes were given as δ13C and δ15N for stable isotopes of C and N, respectively. Raw data C, N and stable isotope data were calibrated with certified standard and blank effects were corrected with the ilokeirms package (Teickner & Knorr, 2024). Using Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-MIR) (Agilent Cary 670 FTIR spectromter, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Ca, USA) humification indices (HI) were determined. Spectra were recorded from 600 cm-1 to 4000 cm-1 with a resolution of 2 cm-1 and baselines corrected with the ir package (Teickner, 2025) to estimate relative peack heights. The HI (no unit) for each sample was calculated by taking the ratio of intensities at 1630 cm-1 to the intensities at 1090 cm-1. Bulk densities (g cm-3) were estimated from FT-MIR data (Teickner et al., in preparation).
This dataset contains geochemical variables measured in six depth profiles from ombrotrophic peatlands in North and Central Europe. Peat cores were taken during the spring and summer of 2022 from Amtsvenn (AV1), Germany; Drebbersches Moor (DM1), Germany; Fochteloër Veen (FV1), the Netherlands; Bagno Kusowo (KR1), Poland; Pichlmaier Moor (PI1), Austria and Pürgschachen Moor (PM1), Austria. The cores AV1, DM1 and KR1 were taken using a Wardenaar sampler (Royal Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, the Netherlands) and had diameter of 10 cm. The cores FV1, PM1 and PI1 had an 8 cm diameter and were obtained using an Instorf sampler (Royal Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, the Netherlands). The cores FV1, DM1 and KR1 were 100 cm, core AV1 was 95 cm, core PI1 was 85 cm and core PM1 was 200 cm. The cores were subsampeled in 1 cm (AV1, DM1, KR1, FV1) and 2 cm (PI1, PM1) sections. The subsamples were milled after freeze drying in a ballmill using tungen carbide accesoires. X-Ray Fluorescence (WD-XRF; ZSX Primus II, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine Al (μg g-1), As (μg g-1), Ba (μg g-1), Br (μg g-1), Ca (g g-1), Cl (μg g-1), Cr (μg g-1), Cu (μg g-1), Fe (g g-1), K (g g-1), Mg (μg g-1), Mn (μg g-1), Na (μg g-1), P (μg g-1), Pb (μg g-1), Rb (μg g-1), S (μg g-1), Si (μg g-1), Sr (μg g-1), Ti (μg g-1) and Zn (μg g-1). These data were processed and calibrated using the iloekxrf package (Teickner & Knorr, 2024) in R. C, N and their stable isotopes were determined using an elemental analyser linked to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA-3000, Eurovector, Pavia, Italy & Nu Horizon, Nu Instruments, Wrexham, UK). C and N were given in units g g-1 and stable isotopes were given as δ13C and δ15N for stable isotopes of C and N, respectively. Raw data C, N and stable isotope data were calibrated with certified standard and blank effects were corrected with the ilokeirms package (Teickner & Knorr, 2024). Using Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-MIR) (Agilent Cary 670 FTIR spectromter, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Ca, USA) humification indices (HI) were determined. Spectra were recorded from 600 cm-1 to 4000 cm-1 with a resolution of 2 cm-1 and baselines corrected with the ir package (Teickner, 2025) to estimate relative peack heights. The HI (no unit) for each sample was calculated by taking the ratio of intensities at 1630 cm-1 to the intensities at 1090 cm-1. Bulk densities (g cm-3) were estimated from FT-MIR data (Teickner et al., in preparation).
Sanukitoids, also referred to as high-Mg diorites, are a distinctive type of igneous rock from the late Archean-early Proterozoic, and are characterised by enrichment in both compatible elements (e.g. Mg, Ni, Cr) and incompatible elements (e.g. Ba, Sr, light rare earth elements). Their geochemistry is typically interpreted as recording petrogenesis of their parental magmas via interaction between mantle peridotite and recycled crust-derived component (e.g. metabasite melts, sediment melts, aqueous fluids), and is often considered to be "transitional" between that of Archean sodic tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suites and post-Archean potassic granites. This dataset presents a global compilation of all Archean-Paleoproterozoic rocks that have been described as "sanukitoid" in published literature, and consists of over 3600 individual samples. Whole rock major and trace element concentrations, radiogenic isotope compositions and stable isotope compositions are compiled in the dataset alongside reported magmatic ages of the samples. The dataset is provided both as an Excel workbook divided by craton (file: 2025-003_Spencer-et-al_Sanukitoid-Compilation.xlsx) and as a single CSV file (file: 2025-003_Spencer-et-al_Sanukitoid-Compilation.csv). Sanukitoid magmatism has been described on almost every Archean craton globally. Most reported sanukitoid magmatism occurred during the late Mesoarchean-Neoarchean (2.95 - 2.5 Ga), with another peak in sanukitoid magmatism in the mid-Paleoproterozoic (2.2 - 2.0 Ga). Older sanukitoid occurrences dating back to the Paleoarchean (>3.2 Ga) are also described in the literature.
Globally, agriculture covers 40% of the earth’s surface and food systems are responsible for one-third of humanity’s contribution to global climate change. Yet, smallholder and subsistence farmers are among the most vulnerable to climate change, with extreme weather events and related food price volatility affecting livelihoods, biodiversity, and food security at multiple scales. This project builds on transdisciplinary research on agroecological transitions in vulnerable farming communities in Canada, Germany, India and Brazil. We will examine the influence of agroecological networks (farming organizations, institutional actors, and consumer groups) in promoting the perennialization of agriculture to support climate adaptation (improving resilience in livelihoods and food security) and mitigation (increasing carbon sequestration). Perennialization of agriculture integrates annual and perennial crops and trees into the same farming system. Compared to annual cropping systems which currently dominate global agriculture and markets, perennial crops show promise for climate adaptation and mitigation because of their contributions to carbon sequestration in tree biomass and soil organic carbon, and their buffering effects against soil degradation, drought, and other forms of extreme weather and climate variability. From a social wellbeing perspective, agroforestry and other diversified perennial systems offer opportunities to adapt to climate change and escape poverty traps, including higher and more stable farm incomes, balanced agricultural labour across growing seasons, improved working conditions compared to more input-intensive forms of agriculture and improved nutrition and health. Using a participatory action research approach, this project will use a novel methodology to test the relationships between personal, political, and practical leverage points driving the adoption of agroforestry and other practices supporting agricultural perennialization. We will sample farms and organizations in each case study across a diversification gradient from low-diversity farming systems to perennial and agroforestry-based management systems. We will then use qualitative and quantitative methods to assess climate resilience outcomes and estimate the potential of scaling adoption of perennial and agroforestry practices. A cross-case synthesis will take local institutional, environmental, and relational contexts into account to inform decision-making.
Water is an intrinsic component of ecosystems acting as a key agent of lateral transport for particulate and dissolved nutrients, forcing energy transfers, triggering erosion, and driving biodiversity patterns. Given the drastic impact of land use and climate change on any of these components and the vulnerability of Ecuadorian ecosystems with regard to this global change, indicators are required that not merely describe the structural condition of ecosystems, but rather capture the functional relations and processes. This project aims at investigating a set of such functional indicators from the fields of hydrology and biogeochemistry. In particular we will investigate (1) flow regime and timing, (2) nutrient cycling and flux rates, and (3) sediment fluxes as likely indicators. For assessing flow regime and timing we will concentrate on studying stable water isotopes to estimate mean transit time distributions that are likely to be impacted by changes in rainfall patterns and land use. Hysteresis loops of nitrate concentrations and calculated flux rates will be used as functional indicators for nutrient fluxes, most likely to be altered by changes in temperature as well as by land use and management. Finally, sediment fluxes will be measured to indicate surface runoff contribution to total discharge, mainly influenced by intensity of rainfall as well as land use. Monitoring of (1) will be based on intensive sampling campaigns of stable water isotopes in stream water and precipitation, while for (2) and (3) we plan to install automatic, high temporal-resolution field analytical instruments. Based on the data obtained by this intensive, bust cost effective monitoring, we will develop the functional indicators. This also provides a solid database for process-based model development. Models that are able to simulate these indicators are needed to enable projections into the future and to investigate the resilience of Ecuadorian landscape to global change. For the intended model set up we will couple the Catchment Modeling Framework, the biogeochemical LandscapeDNDC model and semi-empirical models for aquatic diversity. Global change scenarios will then be analyzed to capture the likely reaction of functional indicators. Finally, we will contribute to the written guidelines for developing a comprehensive monitoring program for biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Right from the beginning we will cooperate with four SENESCYT companion projects and three local non-university partners to ensure that the developed monitoring program will be appreciated by locals and stakeholders. Monitoring and modelling will focus on all three research areas in the Páramo (Cajas National Park), the dry forest (Reserva Laipuna) and the tropical montane cloud forest (Reserva Biologica San Francisco).
Enhanced mineral dissolution in the benthic environment is currently discussed as a potential technique for ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. This study explores how biogeochemical processes affect the dissolution of alkaline minerals in surface sediments during laboratory incubation experiments. These involved introducing dunite and calcite to organic-rich sediments from the Baltic Sea under controlled conditions in an anoxic to hypoxic environment. The sediment cores were incubated with Baltic Sea bottom water. Eight sediment cores were positioned vertically in a rack. Since the sediment surface was slightly oxidized by the bottom water (∼125 μmol l−1 upon recovery), the cores were left plugged on the top for 13 days to settle after recovery until the sediment surface was anoxic. To achieve chemical conditions that are expected in the natural system, 500l of retrieved sea water were degassed via bubbling with pure dinitrogen gas in batches of 100 l. Afterwards, between 50 and 60 l were transferred into an evacuated gas tight bag. After the transfer, pH and total alkalinity (TA) were measured to determine the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) of the water. Afterwards the DIC was increased via adding pure CO2 until a CO2 partial pressure (pCO2 ) of ∼2,300–∼3,300 μatm was established mimicking conditions prevailing in Boknis Eck during summer. Stirring heads were installed on the cores. To prevent the development of oxic conditions, it was ensured that as little gas phase as possible was left in the cores. Elimination of pelagic autotrophs, heterotrophs, and suspended particles was achieved by flushing the cores with modified bottom water for 2 days with a flow rate of 1.5 mml min−1. Afterwards, a continuous throughflow of 700 μl min−1 from the reservoir of modified bottom water was applied, leading to a residence time of ∼2.1 days inside the cores. For the experimental incubations, six cores received additions of alkaline materials, three with calcite (Cal1 - Cal3) and three cores with dunite (Dun1 - Dun3), leading to three replicates per treatment. Two control cores remained untreated (C1, C2). The amount of added substrate was based on the rain rate of particulate organic carbon observed in Boknis Eck (0.5 mmol cm−2 a−). The incubation lasted for 25 days. The volume of water in each core was determined at the end of the experiment via measuring the height of the water column after removing the stirring heads. At the end of the experiments, the bottom water was removed via suction and the cores were sliced for pore water analysis. The pore waters were recovered by centrifuging each respective sediment layer in 50 ml falcon tubes at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Afterwards, the supernatant water was transferred to polyethylene (PE) vials in an Ar-filled glove bag to minimize contact with oxygen. All samples were filtered through a 0.2 µm cellulose membrane filter and refrigerated in 25 ml ZinsserTM scintillation vials. TA samples (1 ml) were titrated with 0.02N HCl. For H2S, an aliquot of pore water was diluted. A 5 ml aliquot was frozen directly after the sampling procedure for later nutrient analysis. Nutrient measurements were performed either via manual photometric measurement (NH4) or using a Seal – AnalyticalTM QuAAtro autoanalyzer (PO43-). Samples for TA were analyzed directly after sampling by titration of 1 ml of bottom/pore water with 0.02N HCl. Titration was ended when a stable purple color appeared. During titration, the sample was degassed by continuous bubbling with nitrogen to remove any generated CO2 and H2S. The acid was standardized using an IAPSO seawater standard. Acidified sub-samples (30 μl suprapure HNO3- + 3 ml sample) were prepared for analyses of major and trace elements (Si, Na, K, Li, B, Mg, Ca, Sr, Mn, Ni and Fe) by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Varian 720-ES). For H2S, an aliquot of pore water was diluted with appropriate amounts of oxygen-free artificial seawater and the H2S was fixed by immediate addition of zinc acetate gelatin solution
Von der so genannten Abwasserabgabe profitierte der Landkreis Harz im Jahr 2025 mit über 5 Mio. Euro . Dabei flossen 3,6 Mio. Euro in eine Maßnahme in Treseburg. Weitere 1,4 Mio. Euro wurden in eine Maßnahme in Breitenstein investiert. Beide Maßnahmen wurden vom Zweckverband Ostharz realisiert. Im Jahr 2025 verzeichnete das Landesverwaltungsamt Einnahmen aus der Abwasserabgabe in Höhe von 14 Mio. EUR (Stand 31.12.2025). Diese beruhen auf insgesamt ca. 1.800 Bewertungen von Abwassereinleitungen, in deren Ergebnis diese Umweltabgaben verhängt wurden. Im Jahr zuvor wurden 14,1 Mio. EUR eingefordert. Landesweit ist erfreulicherweise ein leichter Rückgang der Anzahl der Schmutzwassereinleitungen zu verzeichnen. „Wer Gewässer durch das Einleiten von Abwasser verschmutzt, muss dafür ein zweckgebundenes Ressourcennutzungsentgelt zahlen. Das ist die Wirkungsweise der so genannten Abwasserabgabe. Sie wurde im Jahre 1976 eingeführt, als erste Umweltabgabe überhaupt.“, erklärt der Präsident des Landesverwaltungsamtes Thomas Pleye. Für das Einleiten von Abwasser in ein Gewässer ist vom Verursacher eine Abgabe zu entrichten. Deren Höhe richtet sich nach der Höhe und Schädlichkeit der eingeleiteten Abwasserfracht. Die Abwasserabgabe sorgt dafür, dass für die Nutzung der Gewässer für das Beseitigen von Abwasser eine finanzielle Kompensation gezahlt werden muss. Sie soll den Vorteil abschöpfen, den die Inanspruchnahme dieses öffentlichen Guts für den Einleiter hat. Für die Festsetzung und Erhebung der Abwasserabgabe ist in Sachsen-Anhalt zentral das Landesverwaltungsamt zuständig. Das Aufkommen der Abwasserabgabe ist im Wesentlichen für den Gewässerschutz zu verwenden und wird so in die heimische Umwelt reinvestiert. Mit diesen Mitteln wurden im Jahr 2025 landesweit 16 Maßnahmen fertiggestellt, für die Fördermittel von ca. 11 Mio. Euro bereitgestellt wurden. Im Jahr 2025 wurden darüber hinaus 10 Maßnahmen mit Zuwendungen von rund 4,7 Mio. EUR aus dem Aufkommen der Abwasserabgabe neu bewilligt, die sich nun in der Umsetzung befinden. Hintergrund Gewässer durch das Einleiten von Abwasser nutzen zu dürfen: Dies hat einen Preis, einerlei, ob das Einleiten vermeidbar wäre oder nicht. Werden Überwachungswerte überschritten, handelt es sich um eine übermäßige Nutzung - dann ist der Preis entsprechend höher. Das aber kann der Einleiter in aller Regel vermeiden, indem er entsprechende Vorsorge trifft, um seine Anlagen unter allen zu erwartenden Betriebszuständen ordnungsgemäß betreiben zu können. Die Abwasserabgabe flankiert gewissermaßen die Gebote und Verbote des Wasserrechts. Die jährlichen Einnahmen in diesem Bereich schwanken daher naturgemäß. Investiert der Einleiter in seine Anlagen, um die Reinigungsleistung zu verbessern und um zusätzliche Einwohner anzuschließen, kann er solche Aufwendungen unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen mit seiner Abwasserabgabe verrechnen. Seit einigen Jahren betrifft das ungefähr die Hälfte der landesweit festgesetzten Abwasserabgabe; zuvor war der Anteil noch deutlich höher. Investitionen in den Anlagenbestand werden also prämiert. Die Abwasserabgabe setzt auch insoweit wirtschaftliche Impulse. Das Aufkommen der Abwasserabgabe steht für Maßnahmen des Gewässerschutzes zur Verfügung. In Sachsen-Anhalt sind so seit 1995 rund 250 Mio. EUR in die Abwasserinfrastruktur der kommunalen Aufgabenträger geflossen. Davon haben vor allem die Verbraucher als Gebührenzahler profitiert. Aber ebenso sind Maßnahmen zur Gewässerrenaturierung oder zur Verbesserung der Gewässergüte zu finanzieren. Gewässerschutz braucht Kontrollen und Förderung Kontrollen sind essenziell für den Gewässerschutz – sie umfassen technische Überwachung, Probenahmen, Genehmigungen und die Kontrolle geförderter Bauprojekte. Ungefähr 750 industrielle und gewerbliche Anlagen unterliegen in Sachsen-Anhalt den speziellen Vorschriften der Industrieemissionsrichtline der Europäischen Union. Dazu gehören beispielsweise Chemieanlagen, Tierhaltungsanlagen und Abfallbehandlungsanlagen. Oft sind dabei auch wasserrechtliche Tatbestände betroffen und müssen regelmäßig u.a. durch die Wasserwirtschaftsingenieure des Landesverwaltungsamtes kontrolliert werden. Bei kommunalen Abwassermaßnahmen, die vom Landesverwaltungsamt bezuschusst werden, wird der Baufortschritt überwacht und Auszahlungsanträge freigegeben. Allein 2025 hat das LVwA aus Mitteln des Europäischen Fonds für Regionale Entwicklung (EFRE) 28,9 Mio. Euro für 25 wasserwirtschaftliche Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Energieeffizienz bewilligt. Hinzu kamen weitere 10 Bewilligungen aus nationalen Mitteln für weitere wasserwirtschaftliche Maßnahmen mit einem Umfang von ca. 4,7 Mio. Euro. Die Zuschüsse sollen dazu beitragen, dass die kommunalen Anlagen auf einem sehr hohen technischen Stand und die Gebühren und Beiträge der Einwohner in einem verträglichen Rahmen bleiben. Impressum: Landesverwaltungsamt Pressestelle Ernst-Kamieth-Straße 2 06112 Halle (Saale) Tel: +49 345 514 1244 Fax: +49 345 514 1477 Mail: pressestelle@lvwa.sachsen-anhalt.de
| Organisation | Count |
|---|---|
| Bund | 484 |
| Europa | 93 |
| Global | 1 |
| Kommune | 54 |
| Land | 276 |
| Weitere | 67 |
| Wissenschaft | 447 |
| Zivilgesellschaft | 9 |
| Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Agrarwirtschaft | 2 |
| Chemische Verbindung | 4 |
| Daten und Messstellen | 212 |
| Ereignis | 2 |
| Förderprogramm | 420 |
| Hochwertiger Datensatz | 1 |
| Software | 1 |
| Taxon | 21 |
| Text | 109 |
| Umweltprüfung | 102 |
| unbekannt | 200 |
| License | Count |
|---|---|
| Geschlossen | 233 |
| Offen | 785 |
| Unbekannt | 27 |
| Language | Count |
|---|---|
| Deutsch | 425 |
| Englisch | 661 |
| Resource type | Count |
|---|---|
| Archiv | 96 |
| Bild | 7 |
| Datei | 105 |
| Dokument | 134 |
| Keine | 461 |
| Unbekannt | 28 |
| Webdienst | 48 |
| Webseite | 227 |
| Topic | Count |
|---|---|
| Boden | 691 |
| Lebewesen und Lebensräume | 877 |
| Luft | 536 |
| Mensch und Umwelt | 1045 |
| Wasser | 667 |
| Weitere | 982 |