s/richtlinie 1999/30/ewg/Richtlinie 1999/30/EG/gi
The final goal of the EUROWET project is to integrate the substantial multidisciplinary European research in wetlands to help attain the sustainable management of the water cycle. This will be achieved by the translation of state-of-the art science developed at both national and European levels, into practical guidance for end-users. This will be achieved by a comprehensive review, expert assessment and a focussed dissemination strategy. There is considerable scientific knowledge and technical experience gained in diverse aspects of wetland science and management including hydrology, biogeochemistry, ecology restoration, socio-economic and policy analysis. However the results of research and management experience are still too fragmentary and not sufficiently orientated to problem-solving or simply inadequately framed to be effectively transferred to, or used by, stakeholders and policy-makers. Simultaneously the general outcome of the scientific research has been increased awareness of the significance of wetlands in delivering goods and services important for human welfare including quality of life, biodiversity conservation and maintenance or enhancement of environment quality. Despite this wetlands continue to be degraded and lost throughout Europe without adequate consideration of the wider benefits to be achieved from this management. The new Water Framework Directive (WFD) promotes a unique opportunity to redress this problem by means of the holistic, integrated approach to water management. There is currently in preparation horizontal guidance on Wetlands as part of the Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) process. There is however work still to be done on providing more specific scientific and technical guidance on the effective implementation of the Directive with respect to wetlands. This is particularly the case in relation to Integrated River Management, the CIS cluster within which wetlands are being considered in the WFD.
Die Immissionsüberwachung wird in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern durch den Betrieb eines landesweiten Luftmessnetzes gewährleistet. Entsprechend bestehender Gesetze werden folgende Aufgaben durchgeführt: -Überwachung von Grenzwerten -Ermittlung der städtischen und ländlichen Hintergrundbelastung -Ermittlung der Belastung an verkehrsbelasteten Standorten -Ermittlung der Belastung im Umfeld von Industriebetrieben und Hafenanlagen -Beobachtung der Langzeitentwicklung -Ermittlung der Ursachen von Grenzwertverletzungen -Uberprüfung der Maßnahmen zur Luftreinhalteplanung -Information der Öffentlichkeit entsprechend der vorgeschriebenen EU-Richtlinien -Datenauswertung und Beurteilung entsprechend der vorgeschriebenen EU-Richtlinien und nationaler Gesetze und Vorschriften -Datenaustausch -besondere Berichtspflichten bestehen gegenüber der EU -Entwicklung von Messtrategien -Einsatz verschiedenster Messverfahren und Kalibriertechniken Die stationären Messstationen sind entsprechend ihres Einsatzzweckes mit verschiedenen Messgeräten ausgestattet, mit denen es möglich ist, die kontinuierliche Überwachung der Luftschadstoffbelastung an Feinstaub (bis1998 Schwebstaub), Stickoxiden, Ozon, Schwefeldioxid und Kohlenmonoxid kontinuierlich zu überwachen, zu erfassen und zeitnah hierüber zu berichten. Für die Ermittlung der Benzolkonzentrationen kommen an drei Standorten Passivsammler zum Einsatz. An einigen der Messstationen wurden darüber hinaus Geräte zur diskontinuierlichen Feinstaubsammlung installiert, um nach Laboranalysen Kenntnisse über die Inhaltsstoffe des Feinstaubs (z. B. PAK und Schwermetalle) zu gewinnen. Diese Daten werden gegenwärtig in 14 vollautomatisch betriebenen Messcontainern an folgenden Standorten gewonnen: verkehrsnah gelegene Messstationen in: Neubrandenburg, Rostock, Schwerin, Stralsund, Wolgast ländlich gelegene Messstationen: Gülzow, Göhlen, Löcknitz, Rostock-Stuthof, Leizen, Garz Messstationen im städtischen Hintergrund: Güstrow, Rostock-Warnemünde. Desweiteren wird ein NH3-Messnetz zur orientierenden Messung betrieben, um die Kenntnisse über die räumliche Variabilität der NH3-Immissonen im ländlichen Raum zu verbessern und damit wichtige Informationen z. B. im Rahmen von Genehmigungsverfahren zu generieren.
Zur EU-Berichterstattung gehören Auswertungen aller gemessenen Luftschadstoffe entsprechend der gültigen EU-Richtlinien, umgesetzt in deutsches Recht in der 39. BImSchV, die auf den 1-Stunden-Mittelwerten aller 14 Messstationen des Landes Mecklenburg-Vorpommern basieren. Hierbei wird zwischen -den verkehrsnah gelegenen Messstandorten Rostock-Holbeinplatz Rostock-Am Strande Neubrandenburg Stralsund-Knieperdamm Schwerin-Obotritenring Wolgast-Oberwallstraße, -den ländlich gelegenen Messstandorten Gülzow Löcknitz Rostock-Stuthof Göhlen Leizen Garz -den Standorte im städtischen Hintergrund Güstrow Rostock-Warnemünde unterschieden.
Das Europäische Umweltbüro EEB und der BUND Sachsen, unterstützt von der Anwaltskanzlei Baumann, haben eine EU-Beschwerde gegen die Bundesrepublik Deutschland bei der EU-Kommission eingereicht. Der Regierung und den Vollzugsbehörden in Sachsen wird vorgeworfen, Vattenfall/EnBW für das Braunkohlekraftwerk Lippendorf eine unberechtigte Ausnahme von strikteren Grenzwerten für Schwefeldioxid gestattet zu haben, welches nicht die Bedingungen der EU-Vorgaben – so die Einschätzung EEB und BUND Sachsen – erfülle. Die Genehmigung seitens der Behörden erlauben Schwefelemissionen bis zu 375 mg/Nm³, die EU-Vorgaben erlauben bis zu maximal 200 mg/Nm³. Das EU-Recht erlaubt eine Abweichung jedoch nur, falls eine technische Begründung der Behörde zuvor übermittelt wird. Diese muss belegen, dass der reguläre Emissionsgrenzwert nicht durchführbar ist. Das EEB und die Anwaltskanzlei Baumann bemängeln, dass keine entsprechende Begründung vorliegt und die Behörde die Sonderverschmutzungsrechte dennoch gestattet hätte.
The project aims at supporting the implementation of the proposed Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of waste from the extractive industries 2003/0107. The Directive was prepared following several major accidents with a serious impact on the environment, and it has the purpose of ensuring a safer management of the mining waste facilities, so that such accidents will not occur in the future. This project addresses particularly Article 9, which provides for the classification of waste facilities with respect to the possible consequences of an accident, and respectively the Annex II: Characterisation of mining waste and Annex III: Criteria for the classification of waste facilities. The activities of the project are divided into four major work packages as follows: - Preparation of a Methodology for the Characterisation of Mining Waste - Elaboration of a Risk Assessment Methodology for the Classification of Mining Waste Facilities, including Old/Abandoned Mining Waste Facilities - Review of Techniques for the Prevention and Abatement of Pollution Generated by Mining Wastes - Development of a Decision Support Tool for Minimising the Impact of the Mining Industry on the Environment. The Consortium co-ordinated by BIUTEC, Austria, includes universities, research institutes, NGOs and implementing authorities from 8 European countries, both Members of the EU and accession countries. The experts team is highly qualified and has many years of experience and research in this area, so that the best outputs can be obtained. The project will build on the results of other projects carried out in this field, and will relate closely to on-going projects, so that there is no overlap in our activities. In order to provide an effective tool for the potential beneficiaries, the project team will consult with representatives of the stakeholders before the final versions of the outputs are publicly made available on the project web-site.
The working documents on revision of the Sewage Sludge Directive (86/278/EEC) on Biowaste and the Soil Protection Communication call for standards on sampling and analysis of sludge, treated biowastes and soils. The European Directives are intended to prevent unacceptable release of contaminants, impairment of soil function, or exposure to pathogens, and to protect crops, human and animal health, the quality of water and the wider environment when sludges and treated biowastes are used on land. The EU animal by-product regulations are fixing microbiological threshold values, for which microbiological methods of analysis are needed. The European Commission wishes to cite European (CEN) standards in order that there is harmonised application of the directives and that reports from Member States (MS) can be compared. This project to develop standards for hygienic parameters in sludge, soil and biowaste, presented under the name 'HORIZONTAL-HYG', will be carried out under the umbrella of the main project HORIZONTAL 'Development of horizontal standards for soil, sludge and biowaste'. This ensures full integration in the CEN system through BT Task Force 151 specially set up in support of this project as well as direct supervision by DG ENV and MS, which form the Steering Committee of HORIZONTAL. Preparation of HORIZONTAL-HYG was taken in a full agreement with the DG ENV, DG JRC and the MS already contributing to HORIZONTAL. HORIZONTAL-HYG's objective is to produce standardised methods for sampling and hygienic microbiological parameters, as Salmonella spp, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Ascaris ova in sludges, treated biowastes and soils written in CEN format. Validation of the methods is an essential part of the development as it quantifies performance in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. The consortium is well connected in CEN and ISO and thus provides an excellent basis for implementation of the deliverables. Prime Contractor: Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland; Petten, Netherlands.
Article 16 of the Water Framework Directive (WFD, Directive 2000/60/EC) lays down the Community Strategy for the establishment of harmonised quality standards and emission controls for the priority substances and other substances posing a significant risk to, or via, the aquatic environment. In order to achieve the protection objectives of the WFD, the Commission shall (i) submit proposals for quality standards applicable to the concentrations of the priority substances in surface water, sediment or biota, and (ii) identify the appropriate cost-effective and proportionate level and combination of product and process controls for both point and diffuse sources. Proposals for environmental quality standards and emission controls for point sources shall be submitted within 2 years of the inclusion of the substance concerned on the list of priority substances (European Parliament and Council Decision No. 2455/2001/EC), i.e. in December 2003. This study is part of the preparatory work of the Commission and its overall objectives are: - The development and description of a concept which enables the European Commission to submit proposals for quality standards applicable to the concentrations of the priority substances of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) and those substances not on the priority list but regulated in the 'daughter directives' of Directive 76/464/EEC (on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community) in water, sediment and biota, as required by Articles 16(7) and 16(10) of the Water Framework Directive. - Elaboration of proposals for quality standards for the priority substances of the Water Framework Directive and recommended values for other substances of concern (see footnote 1) with regard to surface water, sediment, biota, and human health as objectives of protection. Conclusions: The elaboration of quality standards with the developed methodological framework clearly showed that the proposed approach is applicable for the derivation of specific quality standards addressing the particular objectives of protection as well as for the identification of the overall quality standard that finally may be imposed to safeguard the entire set of objectives of protection. Also, with regard to the effort required to work with the concept, it can be considered as economic. This is attributable to the fact that despite the comprehensive consideration of all relevant routes of exposure and objectives of protection the different quality standards for the specific objectives are normally only derived if certain pre-defined trigger values are exceeded. This avoids the assessment of irrelevant exposure routes and the calculation of unnecessary standards. Problems encountered during the elaboration of the standards were in general not attributable to the suggested methodological framework but mostly to the limited availability of data or to the limitations of the available data.
Urban regions in the EU face increasing but uncertain flood risks due to urbanization and the effects of climate change. In European (a.o. the Flood Risk Directive) and in national and regional policies, attempts are made to diversify and align different Flood Risk Strategies (FRSs). In our proposal, five such strategies are distinguished: risk prevention; flood defense; mitigation; preparation; and recovery. We assume that vulnerable urban agglomerations will be more resilient if multiple FRSs are applied simultaneously, linked together and aligned. At the same time, the application of a diverse cluster of FRSs has to be appropriate, i.e. attuned to the physical and social context. The latter asks for innovative Flood Risk Governance Arrangements (FRGAs). In the proposed program, insights from governance and legal scholars will be integrated and combined, leading to policy design principles for FRGAs as well as concrete recommendations for policy and law at the level of the EU, its member states, regional authorities, and public-private partnerships. Across different EU countries and regions, we expect to identify different mixes of FRSs. We will analyze, explain and evaluate the emergence and dominance of the FRGAs through which these FRSs are institutionally embedded. For this, a comparative analysis of FRGAs in six EU member states will be carried out. This analysis will reveal good practices, provide understanding of the resilience of FRSs as well as their appropriateness in different physical, social and legal contexts. The design principles thus derived, will be brought together in a design-oriented framework for ex-ante evaluation of FRGAs. As part of the program, various target group specific knowledge dissemination activities will be carried out, aimed at regional stakeholders, high level policymakers and EU officers. To this end, Grontmij, a consultancy company, and CEPRI (The European centre for flood risk prevention) have been included in the consortium, apart from universities in the six EU member states.'
Der seit 2010 geltende Luftqualitäts-Jahresgrenzwert für Stickstoffdioxid von 40 Mikrogramm pro Kubikmeter wurden in einigen Gebieten Deutschlands nicht eingehalten. Die europäische Luftqualitätsrichtlinie (2008/50/EG) räumt die Möglichkeit ein, für die betroffenen Gebiete bei der Europäischen Kommission eine Fristverlängerung für die Einhaltung der Grenzwerte zu beantragen. Bis zum 01.Januar 2015 kann die Grenzwerteinhaltung von den Kommunen maximal aufgeschoben werden. Voraussetzung dafür sind genaue Aufstellungen, welche Maßnahmen in den Städten wann getroffen werden sollen und welches Minderungspotential gesehen wird. In ihrem Beschluss vom 20. Februar 2013 teilte die Europäische Kommission mit, dass sie bei 33 von 57 Fristverlängerungsanträgen deutscher Regionen Einwände erhebt. Die eingereichten Unterlagen sind nach Auffassung der Kommission nicht ausreichend und gehen in einigen Fällen nicht über das Niveau von Entwürfen hinaus. Halten die Kommunen die Grenzwerte nicht ein, droht Deutschland im schlimmsten Fall ein Vertragsverletzungsverfahren von der EU mit hohen Strafzahlungen.
The objective of CEFES is to perform a focused assessment and evaluation of data in EU forest monitoring networks to provide policy relevant information on: - The interactive effects of climate change with air quality change (nitrogen (N) deposition and ozone (O3) exposure) on European forest ecosystems and their services (wood production, C sequestration, biodiversity and the protective functions of forests in view of an adequate soil and water quality). - The way in which adaptive and sustainable forest management strategies can be used to mitigate climate and air quality change effects on forest structures and functions and keep forests sustainable in the long-term. The evaluations will be based on available data from forest monitoring systems at the European scale (mainly available data at ICP forests Level II and Level I plots with additional data derived in the LIFE+ FUTMON project) in combination with available databases on air quality and meteorology, and key data assessed in CEFES itself. More specifically, the objectives are to evaluate the above mentioned datasets and to assess the climate (precipitation, temperature) and air quality (N and acid deposition, O3) pressures and their effects on: - the protective functions of soil and water resources in terms of changes in (i) hydrological budgets and ground water recharge and (ii) soil acidification and N leaching to ground water and surface water; - forest growth, carbon (C) sequestration and the related CO2 exchange; - tree species diversity and ground vegetation, in terms of its nature conservation value; - forest ecosystem health, phenology and regeneration potential. Building on to these evaluations, CEFES aims to identify regionally specific adaptive management strategies in order to mitigate the impact of climate change on forest structures and functions. Considering the LIFE+ objectives, the project aims to contribute specifically to monitoring and evaluation of environmental policy and legislation by: - Evaluation of climate change scenarios, as described by the IPCC scenarios, and air quality change scenarios, as determined by policies related to (i) the Air Quality Framework Directive and related Daughter Directives of the EU and (ii) the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. - Provision of policy relevant information on effects of climate change in relation to air quality change on forest ecosystems in Europe and giving recommendations for adaptation measures at the forest management level. - Provision of data that contributes to the reporting needs (specifically as defined in the criteria and indicators of the Ministerial Conferences of Protection of Forest Ecosystems, MCPFE) and obligations at national and European level.