Die aktuelle politische Lage erfordert eine Überprüfung und eventuelle (Neu-) Justierung der Politik. Im Juni 2023 hat die deutsche Bundesregierung zudem erstmals eine nationale Sicherheitsstrategie vorgestellt. Der darin integrierte breite Sicherheitsbegriff umfasst den Schutz der natürlichen Lebensgrundlagen als einen elementaren Pfeiler. Die Aktivitäten, Maßnahmen und Ziele des Umweltressorts sind, auch mit und neben anderen Akteuren, im Ressortkreis wie auch auf europäischer/internationaler Ebene somit relevant für die Sicherheit und die Umsetzung der Strategie. Hieraus ergibt sich Forschungsbedarf, um z.B. eine umweltgerechtere, nachhaltige Sicherheitspolitik bzw. eine krisenpräventivere Umwelt- und Entwicklungspolitik zu gestalten und konkrete Möglichkeiten zur Umsetzung der Ziele der nationalen Sicherheitsstrategie und des immanenten breiten Sicherheitsbegriffes durch die Umweltpolitik in Deutschland aufzuzeigen. Die Analyse von drei noch auszuwählenden Themenfeldern wird abklären, in welchen konkreten Bereichen welche nationalen politischen Maßnahmen in Hinblick vor allem auf die Zuständigkeiten des BMUV auf internationaler Ebene am effektivsten verhindern können, dass 1) Konflikte zu Umweltzerstörung beitragen, 2) Umweltzerstörung zu Konflikten beiträgt und 3) Umweltschutzmaßnahmen zu Konflikten beitragen. Die Erkenntnisse und Herausforderungen sollen mit den Akteuren reflektiert und deren Austausch ermöglicht werden, um eine kohärente Politikgestaltung im Hinblick auf die Ziele zu fördern. Dabei sollen auch gute und schlechte Praxisbeispiele erfasst werden und in die Prozesse einfließen.
Background and Objectives: The project area is located in the Ashanti Region of Ghana / West Africa in the transition zone of the moist semideciduous forest and tropical savannah zone. Main land use in this region is subsistence agriculture with large fallow areas. As an alternative land-use, forest plantations are under development by the Ghanaian wood processing company DuPaul Wood Treatment Ltd. Labourers from the surrounding villages are employed as permanent or casual plantation workers. Within three forest plantation projects of approximately 6,000 ha, DuPaul offers an area of 164 ha (referred to as Papasi Plantation) - which is mainly planted with Teak (Tectona grandis) - for research purposes. In return, the company expects consultations to improve the management for sustainable timber and pole production with exotic and native tree species. Results: In a first research approach, the Papasi Plantation was assessed in terms of vegetation classification, timber resources (in qualitative and quantitative terms) and soil and site conditions. A permanent sampling plot system was established to enable long-term monitoring of stand dynamics including observation of stand response to silvicultural treatments. Site conditions are ideally suited for Teak and some stands show exceptionally good growth performances. However, poor weed management and a lack of fire control and silvicultural management led to high mortality and poor growth performance of some stands, resulting in relative low overall growth averages. In a second step, a social baseline study was carried out in the surrounding villages and identified landowner conflicts between some villagers and DuPaul, which could be one reason for the fire damages. However, the study also revealed a general interest for collaboration in agroforestry on DuPaul land on both sides. Thirdly, a silvicultural management concept was elaborated and an improved integration of the rural population into DuPaul's forest plantation projects is already initiated. If landowner conflicts can be solved, the development of forest plantations can contribute significantly to the economic income of rural households while environmental benefits provide long-term opportunities for sustainable development of the region. Funding: GTZ supported PPP-Measure, Foundation
In strict nature reserves and core zones of protected areas hunting and forestry operations are often restricted or banned. However, regarding the management of Wild boar, such hunt-free zones are discussed controversially and can lead to conflict. Hunters whose areas border no-hunting zones (and who have to reimburse farmers for crop damages caused by Wild boar) are concerned that the boars may evade effective population management by staying within the limits of the no-hunting zone, and farmers fear increased crop damage in the surroundings of such areas. Some conservationists are also concerned because Wild boars increasingly root protected habitats and can cause damage to rare plant assemblies. The three-year project Wild boar problem in the vicinity of protected areas by the Game Research Institute (Wildforschungsstelle) at the Centre for Agriculture Baden-Württemberg (LAZBW) aims at investigating if and how no-hunting zones might affect Wild boar activity, movement patterns, home range size, and habitat use, as well as crop damage caused by boars, by comparing these aspects between hunting-free zones and unprotected areas. Although there have already been a number of telemetry studies on Wild boar, including space use in the context of hunting activity, to date there is no study that has specifically investigated spatial and ecological aspects in and around protected areas. My dissertation Ecology of Wild boar Sus scrofa in the vicinity of protected areas is being carried out within the scope of the Game Research Institutes project and apart from the aims outlined above, further aspects of Wild boar ecology will be investigated, especially the role of Wild boar as bio-engineer and habitat creator for other species vs. unwanted damages at protected sites. Twenty-seven Vectronic GPS-GSM satellite collars with integrated activity sensors are available to tag Wild boars in three study areas: the non-protected Altdorfer Forest near Aulendorf with regular hunting activity and forestry, the nature reserve Wurzacher Ried with its ca. 700 ha core zone that is a strict reserve with no human activity, and the Biosphere Reserve Swabian Jura, especially in the surroundings of the former military training area near Münsingen and the 170 ha no-usage-area Föhrenberg.
Wildtiere (Arten, Populationen, Individuen, Lebensräume, genetische Vielfalt) werden neben der Jagd von vielen anderen Landnutzungsaktivitäten beeinflusst, die sich im Wildlebensraum vielfach überlagern und oftmals miteinander konkurrieren. Insbesondere in Mehrfachnutzungs-Kulturlandschaften, wie dem Biosphärenpark Wienerwald, können die resultierenden Wechselwirkungen zwischen den Lebensraumansprüchen von Wildtieren, jagdlichen Nutzungsinteressen und anderen Landnutzungsansprüchen oftmals zu Konflikten führen, die der nachhaltigen Erhaltung heimischer Wildtierarten und ihrer Lebensräume, der Nachhaltigkeit der beteiligten Landnutzungen und einer nachhaltigen regionalen Entwicklung insgesamt abträglich sein können. Sektorale Nachhaltigkeitsansätze alleine sind unzureichend und können sogar unbeabsichtigte negative Auswirkungen auf andere Landnutzungen und auf das betreffende Ökosystem haben. Der nachhaltige Umgang mit Wildtieren kann letztlich nur gelingen, wenn alle im Wildlebensraum agierenden Nutzergruppen sich der Auswirkungen ihrer Tätigkeiten auf die Ressource 'Wildtier' sowie auf die jeweils anderen Nutzergruppen bewusst sind. Am Beispiel von 'Wildtieren und Jagd' wurden daher im Biosphärenpark Wienerwald modellhaft Konzepte, Inhalte und Instrumente für eine integrative, d. h. sektorübergreifend abgestimmte Nachhaltigkeitsbeurteilung mehrerer Landnutzergruppen entwickelt. Mittels angewandter und partizipativer Forschungsmethoden (Experteninterviews, breite Nutzerbefragungen, projektbegleitende Partizipation) wurden zentrale Schnittstellen (Antagonismen, Synergiepotenziale) zwischen Wildtieren, Jagd und weiteren regionalen Landnutzungen identifiziert, analysiert und bewertet. Als zentrales Ergebnis liegen sektorübergreifend abgestimmte Sets von Prinzipien, Kriterien und Indikatoren für ein integratives nachhaltiges Wildtiermanagement im Biosphärenpark Wienerwald vor. Die Bewertungssets dienen der Selbstbewertung wesentlicher regionaler Nutzergruppen (Forstwirtschaft, Landwirtschaft, Jagd, Freizeit- und Erholungsmanagement) und ermöglichen es diesen, jeweils eigene Einflussmöglichkeiten auf die nachhaltige Erhaltung von Wildtierarten, deren Lebensräumen und eine nachhaltige Jagd selbst zu überprüfen. Nachhaltigkeitsanforderungen anderer Nutzergruppen wurden dabei jeweils berücksichtigt. Somit wurde am Beispiel der stark vernetzten Thematik 'Umgang mit Wildtieren' erstmals der Schritt von der rein sektorbezogenen hin zu einer sektorübergreifend abgestimmten Erfassung der Nachhaltigkeit vollzogen. Weiters wurden Empfehlungen für ein integratives nachhaltiges Wildtiermanagement sowie für ein diesbezügliches Monitoring ausgearbeitet. Die Projektergebnisse sollen dazu beitragen, Wildtiere und deren Management möglichst konfliktfrei in eine nachhaltige Landnutzung im Biosphärenpark Wienerwald zu integrieren. Die Vollversion des Endberichtes samt Anhängen ist als Download-Publikation auf der Homepage der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Combined production of fuels and chemicals from wood This project examines an innovative approach for pre-treating wood in order to produce fuels and chemicals. In this approach, the researchers combine hot water treatment with so-called radical scavengers. Background Biofuels from wood have economic and ecological advantages as compared to fuels from corn starch and sugar cane (costs, availability, no conflict with food production). However, it is much more difficult to transform wood into biofuels. This is because the components of wood-cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin-are strongly interwoven to protect the plant against external forces, in particular. In the production of biofuels, this impedes the enzymatic degradation of cellulose and lignocellulose into their respective sugars, which can subsequently be fermented to produce, for example, bio-ethanol. Therefore, it is necessary to pre-treat the wood in order to break up its structure and improve the enzymatic access. Aim One possible treatment of biomass would be to dissolve it in hot water, but this is hampered by cross-linking reactions of emerging lignin fragments. So-called 'radical scavengers' can stop these undesired reactions and make the wood much more soluble. This procedure is aimed at achieving, on the one hand, a cellulose fraction with improved enzymatic access and, on the other hand, a high-quality lignin fraction. The latter serves as a starting material for the production of aromatic chemicals. Significance The examined approach is aimed at producing fuels and aromatic chemicals which are today still gained from petrochemical resources. This opens up new avenues for gradually replacing fossil oil with biomass.
The Thematic Node 1 is part of NCCR-North-South and delves into institutions, livelihoods and conflicts. Institutions regulate access to natural, political and symbolic resources and frame the political and social contexts within which social actors strive for their livelihoods. Latent or violent conflicts are also directly linked to the ways in which institutions regulate, or fail to regulate power imbalances within societies, and to the existence or lack of channels through which political grievances can be expressed and negotiated. The overall objective is to research the dynamic and changing roles of political, social, economic and cultural institutions in order to (1) understand how they regulate social interactions between and among individuals and groups (specifically regarding access to livelihood means, and peace and security), and (2) to enable a broader acceptance and legitimacy of institutions relevant for sustainable development. To understand these processes, we interlink our research with contemporary theoretical debates that conceptualise institutions not as given structures that influence peoples behaviour, but as socially constructed rules, regulations, norms and values. This crucial conceptualisation as 'socially constructed allows us to analyse institutions on the one hand as structures or frames established in order to achieve certain social, political or economic goals. On the other hand, it indicates that institutions are also changed, modified or even invented by certain social actors. The focus on actors highlights the potential of disagreement, and thus contestations among actors (state and non-state actors). Thus, 'institutions need to be researched as deeply embedded in social processes, influenced by social actors, their interests and unequal power relations.
In addition to recognizing natural selection as a universal mechanism in evolution, Darwin also saw the importance of sexual selection, yet the two have been traditionally treated largely in isolation. Here I propose to apply experimental evolution (exposing experimental populations to controlled specific selective pressures over many generations in the laboratory) to the ideally suited model system Tribolium castaneum to explore how these evolutionary forces interact and impact on the key processes underlying biodiversity. Understanding how these fundamental forces, singly and in conjunction, influence species divergence remains a major challenge in evolutionary biology. Participation of sexual selection in driving speciation is supported by substantial theoretical evidence. Theory further suggests that evolutionary conflicts (such as between the sexes or between host and parasite) might also accelerate extinction. Additional complexity is introduced by including the environmental context, linking back to natural selection. Direct experimental tests of the above concepts are essentially lacking. I will explicitly target this gap by exploiting powerful experimental evolution, incorporating the interplay between sexual selection intensity, host-parasite conflict, and adaptation to increasing temperature. Projects will assess how selection under evolutionary conflict and environmental change affects both adaptation and extinction rates, aiming to elucidate underlying mechanisms. Additionally, building on clear phenotypic divergence in key traits across experimental evolution lines, I will significantly expand on previous work by assessing patterns of divergence in gene expression, concentrating on target genes associated with reproduction, immunity and heat shock. This research will be of particular interest to scientists working in the fields of evolutionary biology and behavioural ecology, but also to ecologists, reproductive biologists, and conservation biologists. As Tribolium beetles are widespread agricultural pests, results will also be relevant to more applied researchers.
Trees use water while storing carbon; tree crops replace natural forest while reducing poverty; market-oriented monocultures compete with risk-averse poly-cultures, trading off income and risk; plantations displace smallholders, trading off local rights and income opportunities; national reforestation programs use public resources, promising an increase in environmental services that may not happen. Trees in all these examples are closely linked to tradeoffs and conflict, exaggerated expectations and strong disappointment. Integrated Natural Resource Management (INRM) requires site-specific understanding of tradeoffs between and among the goods and services that trees in agro-ecosystems can provide. It is thus costly when compared to readily scalable green revolution technologies. Replicable, cost-effective approaches are needed in the hands of local professionals with interdisciplinary skills to help stakeholders sort out positive and negative effects of trees in multi-use landscapes ( agroforestry) on livelihoods, water and (agro) biodiversity, associated rights and rewards, and thus on Millenium Development Goals (reducing poverty - promoting equitable forms of globalisation - building peace). ICRAF in SE Asia has developed a negotiation support approach for reducing conflict in multi-use landscapes. The approach aims to bridge perception gaps between stakeholders (with their local, public/policy and scientific knowledge paradigms), increase recognition and respect for these multiple knowledge systems, provide quantification of tradeoffs between economic and environmental impacts at landscape scale, and allow for joint analysis of plausible scenarios. Building on the achievements of participatory rural appraisal, we can now add quantitative strengths with the toolbox for tradeoff analysis. The TUL-SEA project (NARS, ICRAF and Hohenheim) will in 3 years lead to: Tests of cost-effectiveness of appraisal tools for tradeoff analysis in a wide range of agroforestry contexts in SE Asia represented by 15 INRM case studies; building on ASB (Alternatives to Slash and Burn; http://www.asb.cgiar.org/) benchmark areas with significant positive local impacts on poverty, environment and peace (www.icraf.org/sea/Publications/searchpub.asp?publishid=1290); Enhanced national capacity in trade-off analysis, information-based INRM negotiations and ex ante impact assessments; An integrated toolbox ready for widespread application. The toolbox consists of instruments for rapid appraisal of landscape, tenure conflict, market, hydrology, agrobiodiversity and carbon stocks, and simulation models for scenario analysis of landscape-level impacts of changes in market access or agroforestry technology.
Traditional state-centric accounts of climate change governance fail to capture the dynamics that characterise international negotiations on climate change mitigation and adaptation. These accounts are largely based on rational choice models of conflict and cooperation in international relations, which assume that states are unitary actors, and that they act rationally in the pursuit of clearly-defined goals. Because of the nature of their assumptions, rational choice models tend to focus exclusively on the international legal process conducted under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. This dissertation, by contrast, adopts a transnational relations approach, which argues that a wider interpretation of governance is required to understand the dynamics of climate change regulation. By defining the constitutive elements of climate change governance, the dissertation aims to highlight the complex web of relationships at national, international, and transnational levels that effect regulatory processes and outcomes, and emphasises the different but complementary roles that states and non-state actors play in climate change governance.
Recent legislation (Cross Compliance, Soil Protection Act of Germany) has forced farmers to keep the level of soil organic carbon (SOC) in their arable soils within certain limits. In the region Cologne/Bonn, an unfavourable constellation of factors (low cattle density, intensive soil tillage etc.) resulted in low contents and stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC). Thus, the farmers are challenged to increase the humus content of their soils. However, the rapid achievement of this objective may conflict (i) specifically with the interests of the local waterworks, and (ii) generally with the environmental targets of the European Community Nitrate Directive: Within Nitrate Vulnerable Zones, application rates of organic manures are restricted to avoid diffuse water pollution from nitrate. Against this background, our project aims at optimizing a system of soil use and management, that (i) assures an adequate humus support and sustainable soil fertility, and that (ii) minimizes the pollution of groundwater. The experiments include (i) quantifying the spatial heterogeneity of various soil parameters (Corg, Ntotal, Nmin, texture, nutrients) within arable fields in order to assess the possibility of a site-specific management; (ii) repeated sampling at selected sites in order to quantify C and N dynamics (incl. nitrate leaching) under different management options; (iii) spiking of soils with 15N in order to detect the fate of fertilizer N; (iv) modelling C and N dynamics for selected fields on the basis of long-term management data.
| Organisation | Count |
|---|---|
| Bund | 34 |
| Europa | 8 |
| Wirtschaft | 1 |
| Wissenschaft | 10 |
| Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Förderprogramm | 34 |
| License | Count |
|---|---|
| Offen | 34 |
| Language | Count |
|---|---|
| Deutsch | 10 |
| Englisch | 31 |
| Resource type | Count |
|---|---|
| Keine | 27 |
| Webseite | 7 |
| Topic | Count |
|---|---|
| Boden | 30 |
| Lebewesen und Lebensräume | 34 |
| Luft | 22 |
| Mensch und Umwelt | 34 |
| Wasser | 27 |
| Weitere | 34 |